Disposed

The Management Sri Garudadevi v. Inspector of Factories

Madras HC1 Jul 2021WP/16692/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In these common writ petitions, the High Court considered objections to an order confirming 480 days worked in 24 months. Finding no objection was raised regarding dismissal and noting the order dated 2007 was old, the Court disposed of the petitions.

What did the court decide?

The writ petitions were disposed of and connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. No costs.

The Management Sri Garudadevi Vs Inspector of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.07.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.VAIDYANATHAN

¶5

W.P.Nos.16692 to 16697 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1,1,1,1,1 and 1 of 2008

¶6

The Management, Sri Garudadevi Spinning Mills Private Limited, Cuddalore Main Road, valapadi, Salem District, Now known as K.A.C.Yarn Private Limited, Rep. by the Managing Director

¶7

... Petitioner in all Wps -vs-

¶8

1.Inspector of Factories, Authority under Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments, (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) act, 1981, Circle – II, Dharmapuri. ... 1^st Respondent in All WPs 2.R.Velumani ...2^nd Respondent in WP.16692/2008 2.A.Sundaram ...2^nd Respondent in WP.16693/2008 2.C.P.Mannar ...2^nd Respondent/in WP.16694/2008 2.C.Duraiswamy ...2^nd Respondent/in WP.16695/2008 2.V.Padmanabhan ...2^nd Respondent/in WP.16696/2008 2.K.Ammasi ...2^nd Respondent/in WP.16697/2008

¶9

Prayer in WP No.16692 of 2008 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records in File No.Aa/1646/2006-5 on the file of the inspector of Factories Authority under Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 Circle – II, Dharmapuri, the first respondent herein, quash the order, dated 22.06.2007 passed therein.

¶10

Prayer in WP No.16693 of 2008 :Writ Petition filed under Article https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶11

226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, Call for records in Aa/1646/2006-4 on the file of the inspector of Factories Authority under Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 Circle – II, Dharmapuri, the first respondent herein, quash the order, dated 22.06.2007 passed therein.

¶12

Prayer in WP No.16694 of 2008 :Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, Call for records in Aa/1646/2006-2 on the file of the inspector of Factories Authority under Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 Circle – II, Dharmapuri, the first respondent herein, quash the order, dated 22.06.2007 passed therein.

¶13

Prayer in WP No.16695 of 2008 :Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, Call for records in Aa/1646/2006-6 on the file of the inspector of Factories Authority under Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 Circle – II, Dharmapuri, the first respondent herein, quash the order, dated 22.06.2007 passed therein.

¶14

Prayer in WP No.16696 of 2008 :Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, Call for records in Aa/1646/2006-1 on the file of the inspector of Factories Authority under Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 Circle – II, Dharmapuri, the first respondent herein, quash the order, dated 22.06.2007 passed therein.

¶15

Prayer in WP No.16697 of 2008 :Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, Call for records in Aa/1646/2006-3 on the file of the inspector of Factories Authority under Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 Circle – II, Dharmapuri, the first respondent herein, quash the order, dated 22.06.2007 passed therein.

¶16

For Petitioner in all W.Ps. : Mr.M.R.Raghavan

¶17

For Respondents : Ms.S.Girija, (for R2) in all W.Ps. Mr.R.Elamparithi, Government Advocate (for R1)

¶18

COMMON ORDER

¶19

As the issue involved in the above Writ Petitions is one and the same, the cases are taken up for disposal by this common order.

¶20

The petitioner has come forward with the present Writ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

petition, challenging the order of the Authority under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981. Based on the documents filed by the Workmen which have been marked as Exs.W1 to W10 and the evidence produced by W1 on behalf of the Workmen, the Authorities came to the conclusion that the employees have completed 480 days in the 24 Calender month. It is to be pointed out that the Management has not let in any evidence and also not marked any Exhibits on their side. The order has been passed as early as 2007 and almost 14 years have gone by, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the order more so, it is the contention of Mr.M.R.Raghavan, learned counsel for the petitioner that the employees have also been dismissed from service.

¶22

In view of the above, this Court is of the opinion that if the workmen have any grievance with regard to dismissal, suspension or retrenchment as per their nomenclature, it is open to them to workout their remedy and if the same is pending, they can agitate it further.

¶23

With the above observation, these Writ petitions are disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar (CCC)

¶26

//True Copy//

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

vum

¶29

¶30

Inspector of Factories, Authority under Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments, (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) act, 1981, Circle – II, Dharmapuri.

¶31

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.30814

¶32

W.P.Nos.16692 to 16697 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1,1,1,1,1 and 1 of 2008

¶33

LN(CO) GN(16/08/2021)

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Management Sri Garudadevi v. Inspector of Factories

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Management Sri Garudadevi v. Inspector of Factories

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Munirathinam, Vs Divisional Forest Officer

Management Vs the Presiding Officer

H. Sundarraj Vs the District Collector

Cenza Technologies, Vs The Employees Provident Fund

K.Mariammal Vs The Union of India

M/s.Alpha Security Instruments (India ) Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Provident Fund Commissioner