respondent including the land belongs to the petitioner without giving any opportunity to the petitioner and without any knowledge of the petitioner, since the said patta has been issued, it cannot be treated that it was an order or decision taken by the Tahsildar concerned in issuance of patta in favour of the fourth respondent on merits. When that being so, the question of filing any appeal to the Appellate Authority does not arise, therefore, the petitioner can very well agitate the issue before the Tahsildar concerned and the Tahsildar, on considering the request of the petitioner and after hearing both the petitioner as well as the fourth respondent, accordingly can rectify the mistake, if he satisfied that the mistake has occurred in issuance of joint patta in Patta No.126 in the name of the fourth respondent. Therefore, the respondents, especially the third respondent can very well consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.10.2018 and after giving an opportunity of being heard to both the petitioner as well as the fourth respondent, a decision can be taken on merits and once such decision is taken by the Tahsildar, pursuant to the direction issued herein, on consideration of the petitioner's representation dated 22.10.2018, thereafter such order if it is aggrieved, such aggrieved party can prefer an appeal under the provisions of the Patta Passbook Act to the Revenue Divisional Officer being the Appellate Authority.
