Writ petitioner sought mandamus to direct the Sub-Registrar to create a charge over property based on a prior decree. The High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the parties had settled the matter.
None. The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.09.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P. NO. 34020 OF 2018
P.C. Eswaramoorthy .. Petitioner Versus
This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to create a charge over the property based on the decree of this Hon'ble Court in A.S. No.382/2010 dated 12.04.2017 by registering the same based on the petitioner's representation dated 11.09.2018
ORDER
Today, when the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and hence the relief sought for herein has become infructuous.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
Sub Assistant Registrar
dhk
To
The Sub Registrar Palladam Thiruppur
W.P. No. 34020 of 2018
PCH(CO) PM/12/10/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.C. Eswaramoorthy
The Sub Registrar Palladam Thiruppur
N. Palanisamy
R. Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
