The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking mandamus regarding insurance claim reassessment. The court held the petition became infructuous as the relief sought had already been granted to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.09.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.NO.11074 OF 2015
M/s.Thiruvannamalai Pothys Rep. by its Proprietor, K.Sekar, 57A, Theradi Street, Tiruvannamalai.
...Petitioner
Versus
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus forbearing the 1st respondent from accepting the Assessing Report submitted by the Meticulous Surveyors Private Limited appointed by the 1st respondent dated 15.11.2014 and direct the 1st respondent to reassess the loss occurred to the petitioner's shop due to accidental fire taken place in the petitioner's shop and sanction the real Insurance Amount, insured in the office of the 1st respondent vide Policy No.012102/11/13/11/00000470 to the petitioner's shop, based on the petitioner's representation made to the 1st respondent on 19.03.2015.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.S.Arunkumar
O R D E R
Today, when the matter was called, there is no representation for the petitioner.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mrr
To
Thiruvannamalai – 606 601.
+1cc to Mr.S.Arunkumar, Advocate, S.R.No.46441
W.P.No.11074 of 2015
JPL(CO) CS/12/10/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s. Thiruvannamalai Pothys
United India Insurance Company Ltd.
R. Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
