Dismissed

P.Chandiran v. The Tahsildar

Madras HC3 Aug 2021WP/32066/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras disposed of a writ petition seeking injunctions against revenue authorities regarding property mutation and patta issuance. The Court noted that the petitioner's grievance was already addressed by an order from the Tahsildar denying the third respondent's application, thereby quashing the need for further judicial intervention.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was closed as the relief sought was satisfied by the Tahsildar's order.

P.Chandiran Vs The Tahsildar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 03.08.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶5

W.P.No.32066 of 2019 and W.M.P.No.32320 of 2019

¶6

P.Chandiran .. Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The Tahsildar Poonamallee, Tiruvallur District.

¶9

Village Administrative Officer, Parivakkam Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Tiruvallur District.

¶10

V.Sudha .. Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from issuing/changing the patta in the name of the 3^rd respondent and from effecting mutation in the village Revenue Records in property having an extent of 1180 sq.ft comprised in S.Nos.47/5C, 47/6 (Survey No.47/15B as per present Patta No.3002 of Survey no.47/15 as per previous patta) in Parivakkam Village within the Sub-Registration District of Poonamallee in Tiruvallur Revenue District without conducting enquiry by affording opportunity to the petitioner in accordance with law.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.Asif Basha for Mr.R.Neelakandan For RR1 to 2 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan (Govt.Advocate) For R3 : No appearance

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

ORDER

¶15

The writ petition has been filed seeking a direction against the 1^st respondent from effecting mutation in the Revenue records with respect to the property measuring 1108 sq.fts comprised in S.Nos.47/5C, 47/6 in Parivakkam Village, within the Sub-Registration District of Poonamalle, Tiruvallur Revenue District, without conducting enquiry.

¶16

2.It is the grievance of the petitioner that the 3^rd respondent had married to the petitioner's son and unfortunately the son died an unnatural death and with respect to the same, it appears a complaint had been given, and a sessions trial is in progress.

¶17

3.An order of the Tasildhar, Poonamallee, Tiruvallur District, issued in March 2020 has been forwarded to this Court. The Tashildar had very clearly stated that patta cannot be granted in the name of the 3^rd respondent, but, if at all an application is made, it can be granted only in the names of the legal heirs of the deceased, Haridoss who is the son of the petitioner. The legal heirs would include the mother of Haridoss and the 3^rd respondent and also the two sons of Haridoss.

¶18

4.The relief sought by the petitioner in the present Writ Petition is directly satisfied by the said order of the 1^st respondent. Nothing further survives in the Writ Petition, and the same is closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶19

Assistant Registrar(CCC)

¶20

// True Copy//

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

smv

¶23

¶24

The Tahsildar Poonamallee, Tiruvallur District.

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶26

Village Administrative Officer, Parivakkam Village, Poonamallee Taluk, Tiruvallur District.

¶27

+1cc to M/s.G.Balaji, Advocate, S.R.No.38322

¶28

W.P.No.32066 of 2019

¶29

SSV(CO) SU(24/08/2021)

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Chandiran v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Chandiran v. The Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

H.Baskar Vs The Commissioner

G.R.Shekar Vs The Government of India

M.Muniyandi Vs The Tahsildar

K.Kalyanasundaram Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

S.Sriniammal Vs The District Collector

Mrs.S.Sasikala, Vs The Special Tahsildar