Disposed

Mrs.S.Sasikala, v. The Special Tahsildar

Madras HC3 Aug 2021WP/31636/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Single Judge disposed of a writ petition seeking mandamus for measurement of property and laying boundary stones. The court directed the petitioner to submit a fresh copy of the representation to the respondent for examination and passing orders within 12 weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to submit fresh representation; respondent to examine and pass orders in 12 weeks; no costs.

Mrs.S.Sasikala, Vs The Special Tahsildar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 03.08.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶5

W.P.No.31636 of 2019

¶6

S.Sasikala .. Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

The Special Tahsildar Adi Dravidar Welfar, Thiruvallur Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

¶9

.. Respondent

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent Authority to measure the petitioner's property, being plot No.67, measuring 0.01.0 ares, comprised in S.No.20, Perumbakkam Village, Thiruvallur Taluk, Thiruvallur District and lay boundary stone upon considering the petitioner's representation dated 03.02.2017 within such time as may be stipulated by the Court.

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the respondent.

¶13

The writ petition has been filed in the nature of Mandamus seeking consideration of representation dated 03.02.2017, which representation was given seeking measurement of the property of the petitioner in plot No.67 measuring 0.01.0 acres in S.No.20, Perumbakkam Village, Thiruvallur Taluk, Thiruvallur District and also to lay boundary stones.

¶14

It is the case of the petitioner that the said land was

¶15

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶16

allotted to her by assignment order dated 27.03.2015 and it is also stated that subsequent to the assignment there was an obligation on the respondent to put boundary stones, since possession had not been handed over. She had given a representation on 03.02.2017.

¶17

It is not known whether from that date onwards till this date owing to passage of four years, the representation has actually been complied with by the respondent. If it had not been done, then a request is placed on the petitioner to place a fresh copy of the said representation to the respondent and on furnishing of such a fresh copy of the representation, the respondent may examine the said representation and pass necessary orders within a period of 12 weeks, after issuing notice to the petitioner.

¶18

The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above terms. No costs.

¶19

Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)

¶20

// True Copy//

¶21

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶22

smv

¶23

To:

¶24

The Special Tahsildar Adi Dravidar Welfar, Thiruvallur Taluk, Thiruvallur District.

¶25

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.38060

¶26

W.P.No.31636 of 2019

¶27

PMK(CO) SU(19/08/2021)

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mrs.S.Sasikala, v. The Special Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs.S.Sasikala, v. The Special Tahsildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

H.Baskar Vs The Commissioner

G.R.Shekar Vs The Government of India

M.Muniyandi Vs The Tahsildar

K.Kalyanasundaram Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

S.Sriniammal Vs The District Collector

P.Chandiran Vs The Tahsildar