Disposed

Vadivel v. The District Collector

Madras HC21 Dec 2021WP/3173/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed directing the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2020 with an opportunity of hearing and dispose within twelve weeks. Court disposed without expressing opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2020, provide opportunity of hearing, and dispose of the matter within twelve weeks.

Vadivel Vs The District Collector — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 21.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

W.P.No.3173 of 2020

Vadivel

...Petitioner

-Vs-

1.The District Collector, The District Collector Office, Tiruppur District.

¶10

2.The Tahsildar, Palladam Taluk office, Palladam - 641 664, Tiruppur District.

¶11

3.The Revenue Inspector, Office of Revenue Department, Palladam - 641 664, Tiruppur District. ...Respondents

¶12

Prayer :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents consider the petitioner's representation dated 03.01.2020 sent by Speed post to the respondents within the stipulated time as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Kalimuthu For Respondents : Mr.S.Rajesh Government Advocate.

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, dated 03.01.2020 sent by Speed post to the respondents within the stipulated time as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court.

¶16

Heard Mr.P.Kalimuthu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.Rajesh, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the writ petition, the second respondent is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 03.01.2020, after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the counter parties if any and dispose of the same, if not already disposed of, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶19

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶20

Sd/Assistant Registrar

¶21

// True Copy //

¶22

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶23

¶24

¶25

1.The District Collector, The District Collector Office, Tiruppur District.

¶26

2.The Tahsildar, Palladam Taluk office, Palladam - 641 664, Tiruppur District.

¶27

3.The Revenue Inspector, Office of Revenue Department, Palladam - 641 664, Tiruppur District.

W.P.No.3173 of 2020

KV(CO)

RVM(21/01/2022)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Vadivel v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vadivel v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alayamani Udayar Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Malathi alias Visalakshi Vs The District Collector

V.Yuvanesh Vs The Secretary

Mrs.C.Dhanalakshmi Vs The Inspector General of Registration

C.M.Balasubramanian Vs The District Revenue Officer

Venkatesan Vs The Sub Registrar