Petitioner sought writ forbearing tax on maximum demand charges per Supreme Court interim order. Court disposed the petition in terms of the Apex Court judgment without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.12.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.No.30465 of 2019 and W.M.P.Nos.30488 & 30489 of 2019
M/s.L&P Somappa Comfort Systems India P Ltd.,
Presently known as Leggett & Platt Automotive India P Ltd., HTSC No.870,
P.No.41, Second Main Road, Industrial Estate, Ambattur, Chennai Represented by its Authorized Signatory, N.Santhosh Kumar Patro ...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Energy Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.
3.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Chennai West Electricity Distribution Circle, Chennai. ...Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the 2nd and 3rd respondents, from demanding and collecting the tax on maximum demand charges from the petitioner in H.T.Sc No.870, as per the orders of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, New Delhi on 31.08.2012 in SLP (C) No.24993 of 2012 and 25522 of 2012 etc. Batch in M/s.Sri Krishna Alloys & Etc. Vs. Union of India and others etc.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj For Respondent R1 : M/s.C.Sangamithirai Special Government Pleader For Respondents R2 & R3 : Mr.L.Jaivenkatesh Standing Counsel
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to forbear the 2nd and 3rd Respondents from demanding and collecting tax on maximum demand charges from the Petitioner in H.T.Sc.No.870 as per the order dated 31.08.2012 passed by the Apex Court in S.L.P.(C) No.24993 of 2012 and 25522 of 2012, etc. batch in the case of M/s.Sri Krishna Alloys vs. Union of India.
“3. The issue raised in the present
Petition is being settled against the Petitioner in terms of the Division Bench judgment in W.P.Nos.159 of 2008 and etc. (batch) decided on 15.06.2012 and thereafter, the Hon'ble Supreme Court having entertained the Special Leave Appeals against the said judgment bearing Special Leave (Civil) Nos.24685 to 24719 of 2012, dated 31.08.2012, with an interim direction restraining the Respondents therein from taking any coercive steps for disconnecting the supply of electricity to the premises of the petitioner therein, subject to that petitioner paying all the charges/dues except tax calculated on the basis of maximum demand, it is agreed that, the present Writ Petition be disposed of in the terms aforesaid, with the agreement that the ultimate fate of the matter before the Hon'ble Supreme Court would also govern the present petitioner and the same interim order would continue to enure for the benefit of the Writ Petitioner during the pendency of the Special Leave Appeals.”
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS-VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
skt
To
1.The Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu, Energy Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Chairman and Managing Director, TANGEDCO Ltd., 144, Anna Salai, Chennai - 600 002.
3.The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO,
Chennai West Electricity Distribution Circle, Chennai.
+1cc to Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj, Advocate SR. No.66411 +1cc to Government Pleader SR. No.66607
W.P.No.30465 of 2019 and W.M.P.Nos.30488 & 30489 of 2019
SR (CO) PR (10/02/2022)
M/s.L&P Somappa Comfort Systems India P Ltd.
State of Tamil Nadu
Chairman and Managing Director, TANGEDCO Ltd.
Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
