Petition filed under Article 226 seeking reconnection of electricity supply. Court noted the service connection was already restored administratively, rendering the writ petition closed without adjudication.
Writ petition closed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.12.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.NO.29620 OF 2019
M/s.Fipola Retail India Pvt. Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director, Sushil Kanugolu, Having Office at No.28, Door No.AC5, 2nd floor, 2nd Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai - 600 040.
... Petitioner .Vs.
PRAYER:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents herein to reconnect the Electricity connection to the Service Connection No.09-462-005-1001 to the factory of the petitioner's company at No.55, 56, 57, Ramakrishna Nagar, Kosapur, Chennai - 600 052.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Selvendran For Respondents : Mr.L.Jaivenkatesh R1 & R2 Standing Counsel For Respondent R3 : No Appearance
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing counsel appearing for the 1st and 2nd respondents submitted that the petitioner factory's Electricity service connection was disconnected on 17.07.2019 as against which the petitioner filed appeal on 03.10.2019. Thereafter, the restoration of service connection to the petitioner factory was ordered on 10.10.2019 and the service connection was restored in favour of the petitioner factory on 14.10.2019. However, without ascertaining the above said facts, the petitioner has filed this Writ petition. Hence, he prays for dismissal of this Writ petition.
Standing Counsel appearing for 1st and 2nd respondents and since the service connection is already restored in favour of the petitioner factory, nothing survives for further adjudication.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
skt
To
W.P.NO.29620 OF 2019
CP(CO)
PBS/27/01/2022
M/s. Fipola Retail India Pvt. Ltd.
The Chairman, Consumer Grievance Redressal, Forum (CGRF) Thirumangalam
The Assistant Executive Engineer, Operation and Maintenance, Chennai Electricity Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO
K. Premavathy
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
