Disposed

Ms. Savitha Rajendran v. The Branch Manager

Madras HC1 Mar 2021WP/29475/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition filed for writ of Mandamus directing a State Bank of India branch to consider an education loan application. Court directed petitioner to produce specific documents within three weeks, instructing the bank to process the application thereafter without prejudging the merits.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to produce documents within three weeks; bank to process application and pass final orders within three weeks thereafter.

Ms. Savitha Rajendran Vs The Branch Manager — Banking and Recovery | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 01.03.2021 CORAM

¶2

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶3

W.P. No.29475 of 2019

¶4

Savitha Rajendran

¶5

¶6

The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Cuddalore OT, Cuddalore - 607 003. ... Respondent

¶7

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus and direct the respondent herein to consider the representation dated 15.04.2019 made seeking for education loan as per the Education Loan Scheme devised by the respondent.

¶8

For petitioner ... Mr.Nazarullah For Respondents ... Mr.C. Mohan for M/s.King & Patridge for R1

¶9

ORDER

¶10

This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for a direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2019 requesting the respondent/bank to sanction educational loan for her B.S. & M.D. Program at Davao Medical School Foundation Inc., in Philippines.

¶11

According to the petitioner, the total cost of her education works out to Rs.25,73,580/-. The petitioner has sought for educational loan from the respondent bank for a sum of Rs.15,00,000/-. Since, the same has not been considered, the petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

¶12

Heard Mr.Nazarullah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.C.Mohan, learned counsel for the respondent / bank.

¶13

The learned counsel for the respondent has placed before this Court a letter dated 20.02.2021 of the respondent /bank to the petitioner's father, wherein, it is stated as follows :-

¶14

1. Student's bonafide certificate to

¶15

ascertain the course period.

¶16

2. Fees schedule given by the university

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

3. Fees paid receipt or fees to be paid details for this year and previous year.

¶19

As seen from the aforesaid letter issued by the respondent / bank, the petitioner has to produce the documents sought for by the respondent / bank for getting the loan to the tune of Rs.7,50,000/- without security. The petitioner has already given a representation seeking the respondents to sanction education loan of Rs.15,00,000/-. However, as seen from the aforesaid letter dated 22.01.2021, the respondent / bank is empowered to sanction loan only to the extent of Rs.7,50,000/-, without security.

¶20

Mr.Nazarullah, learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions would submit that the petitioner is willing to comply with the requirements of the respondent / bank, as stated in the aforesaid letter dated 20.02.2021.

¶21

After recording the submissions made by the respective learned counsels, as well as after recording the letter dated 20.02.2021, this Court directs the petitioner to produce all the documents sought for by the respondent/ bank in the letter dated 20.02.2021, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of the same, the respondent/ bank shall process the loan application of the petitioner and pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law as well as as per the rules prescribed, within a period of three weeks thereafter.

¶22

It is made clear that without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the aforesaid directions are issued by this Court. The presence of Mr.Selvakumar, Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Cuddalore OT, Cuddalore, is also recorded.

¶23

With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar (C.O.)

¶26

/True copy/

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

¶29

The Branch Manager, State Bank of India,Cuddalore OT, Cuddalore - 607 003.

¶30

+1cc to M/s.R.M.D.Nazurullah, Advocate Sr.No.12478 +1cc to M/s.King & Partridge, Advocate Sr.No.12924

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ms. Savitha Rajendran v. The Branch Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms. Savitha Rajendran v. The Branch Manager

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alagesan Vs The Inspector of police

Kaligi Ranganathan J.J.Educational Trust, Vs Union of India

K.Nagarajan Vs Sampath Kumar

Puducherry Bhimsena Vs The Chief Secretary to the

Smt. T.Vijayalakshmi Vs The Railway Board

M/s.Suryaa Enterprises Vs The Deputy Director Genreal of Foreign Trade