Dismissed

M/S.Sun Tv Network Ltd., v. the State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

Madras HC17 Aug 2021WP/12617/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the demand for entry tax on an imported car by the State of Tamilnadu. The court observed that the petitioner had settled arrears and paid the entire tax amount, rendering further adjudication unnecessary.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition is disposed of without costs; the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

M/S.Sun Tv Network Ltd., Vs the State of Tamilnadu Rep. by — Cheque Dishonour | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17.08.2021

¶2

CORAM

¶3

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶4

W.P.No.12617 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009

¶5

M/s. Sun TV Network Ltd., Rep. by its Chief Operating Officer, Mr.Ajay Vidyasagar, 4, Norton Road, Mandaveli, Chennai-600 028. ...Petitioner

¶6

¶7

The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by its Secretary, Home(Transport) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶8

The Commercial Tax Officer, Luz Circle, Chennai.

¶9

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai South East, Chennai.

¶10

The Motor Vehicle Inspector, Chennai South East, Chennai. ...Respondents

¶11

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the Respondents and their subordinates from demanding or collecting entry tax on the petitioner's imported new Bentley Continental Flying Spur – 610 PS Speed Motor Car bearing Chassis No.SCBBZ53W4AC062693 and Engine No.BWR0023337, to be registered and assign new registration mark by the 3^rd and 4^th respondents.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Ravindran

¶13

for Mrs.M.Sneha

¶14

For Respondent : Mr.V.Nanmaran

¶15

Government Advocate ORDER

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that the arrears of tax due are already settled and the respondents also acknowledged the same. The petitioner submitted the copy of the certificate issued by the State Tax Officer on 11.02.2020.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

2.In view of the fact that the petitioner has paid entire tax amount, no further adjudication is required and accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶19

//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

Pns/Kbs To 1. The Secretary, State of Tamilnadu, Home(Transport) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009.

¶21

The Commercial Tax Officer, Luz Circle, Chennai.

¶22

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai South East, Chennai.

¶23

The Motor Vehicle Inspector, Chennai South East, Chennai.

¶24

+1cc to M/s.M.Sneha, Advocate SR.No. 41825 +1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.No. 41838

¶25

W.P.No.12617 of 2009

¶26

PL(CO) A.SK(24.09.2021)

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Sun Tv Network Ltd., v. the State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Sun Tv Network Ltd., v. the State of Tamilnadu Rep. by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Kamachi Sponge and Power Vs The Commissioner of Central

M/S.Grt Hotels and Resorts Vs the State of Tamilnadu

M/S. Raajali Traders, Vs the Assistant Commissioner

Tvl. Srinivasan Associates. Vs Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

N. Narayanan Vs the State of Tamilnadu

Batcha Movies Vs State of Tamilnadu