Disposed

M/s.Tranz India Corporation v. The Assessing Officer

Madras HC26 Apr 2021WP/28106/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court held that disputed facts regarding tax interest calculations and penalties require adjudication through proper evidence and documents. Consequently, the petitioner was granted liberty to approach the appellate authority under Section 246A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The writ petitions were disposed of with directions to file an appeal within three weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted liberty to file an appeal under Section 246A of the IT Act within three weeks; appellate authority directed to consider appeal on merits and pass orders within eight weeks.

M/s.Tranz India Corporation Vs The Assessing Officer — Income Tax | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 26.04.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

W.P.Nos.28106 & 28110 of 2018

¶6

M/s.Tranz India Corporation, Rep., by its Managing Partner, V.Mohanraj, Having Office at 204, Sanjay Raaj Tower, Tatabad, 100 Feet Road, Coimbatore-641 012. .. Petitioner in both W.Ps.

¶7

-vs-

¶8

1.The Assessing Officer, TDS CPC, Ayakar Bavan, Sector-3, Vaishali, Ghaziabad, UP-201 010.

¶9

2.Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS),

¶10

Income Tax Department, Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), No.1510, 1^st Floor, May Flower, Midcity, Trichy Road, Coimbatore. .. Respondents in both W.Ps.

¶11

Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the orders passed by the 2^nd respondent in C.Nos.10(52).264/CIT(TDS)/CBE/2015-16 and 10(53)/264/CIT(TDS)/ CBE/2015-16 dated 30.03.2016, quash the same.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan (In both W.Ps.) for M/s.G.R.Associates For Respondents : Mr.S.Rajesh, (In both W.Ps.) Junior Standing Counsel

¶13

COMMON ORDER

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that there is a dispute regarding the calculation of interest with reference to the relevant duration.

¶15

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner solicited the attention of this Court to the calculations made with reference to the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the IT Act”), and submitted that the calculations are not in consonance with and in accordance with law. However, the said calculations with reference to the

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

records cannot be adjudicated in a writ proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The interest calculations and penalty are to be calculated with reference to the documents available by the competent authority.

¶18

3.The learned Junior Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-Department made a submission that the petitioner is bound to approach the appellate authority by way of appeal under Section 246A of the IT Act. It is submitted that the petitioner has erroneously filed a revision under Section 264 of the IT Act, which was considered on merits, but the petitioner could not able to get appropriate relief. Thus, the petitioner is constrained to move the present writ petition.

¶19

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Junior Standing Counsel for the respondents made a submission that proper course would be to prefer an appeal under Section 246A of the IT Act before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in the format prescribed.

¶20

5.This Court is of the considered opinion that all such disputed facts are to be adjudicated with reference to the documents and evidences made available and therefore, the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the appellate authority under Section 246A of the Act by filing appropriate application.

¶21

6.In view of the facts and circumstances, the following orders are passed:-

¶22

(i) The petitioner is permitted to file an appeal under Section 246A of the IT Act within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order; and

¶23

(ii) The appellate authority on receipt of any such appeal from the writ petitioner shall consider the same on merits and in accordance with law by affording opportunity to the writ petitioner and pass orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date on which the petitioner files the appeal. It is made clear that the appellate authority shall consider the issues independently without reference to any other orders passed by the other authorities.

¶24

7.With the above observations and directions, these writ petitions stand disposed of. No costs.

¶25

Sd/-

¶26

Assistant Registrar (CS-VIII)

¶27

//True Copy//

¶28

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

Abr

¶31

To
1.The Assessing Officer,
TDS CPC, Ayakar Bavan,
Sector-3, Vaishali,
Ghaziabad, UP-201 010.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS),
Income Tax Department,
Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS),
No.1510, 1 st Floor, May Flower, Midcity,
Trichy Road, Coimbatore.
+1cc to Mr.G.R.Associates, Advocate, S.R.No. 26094
+1cc to Mr.S.Rajesh, Advocate, S.R.No. 25570
W.P.Nos.28106 & 28110 of 2018
AK II(CO)
GN(07/07/2021)

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Tranz India Corporation v. The Assessing Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Tranz India Corporation v. The Assessing Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M. Mathakakshmi Vs K. Nandhakumar,Ias

M/S.Madras Race Club Vs the Deputy Commissioner of

M/S.Mardia Sons Holding Pvt. Vs the Deputy Commissioner of

M/s.S.Subrahmanyan Constructions Company Private Limited, Vs Assistant Commisisoner of Income Tax

M/s.Ge T and D India Limited, Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Kovalam Santhana Krishnan Vs Income Tax Officer