M. Mathakakshmi v. K. Nandhakumar,Ias
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge order closing a contempt petition for non-compliance of a writ order. The Court found that the respondents had complied with the prior direction regarding the petitioner's examination details and rejection, rendering no further adjudication necessary.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition stands closed as the respondents complied with the prior order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT.P.No.1065 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.04.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
CONT.P.No.1065 of 2020
M.Mathalakshmi, No.56, Ist Floor, North Street, Pulavankadu Post, Orathanadu Taluk, Thanjavur District .. petitioner vs.
1.Mr.K.Nandhakumar, IA.S, Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-600 003.
2.Mr.R.Sudhan, IAS., Controller of Examinations, Tamil Nadu Public Service Commission, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-600 003. .. Respondents
PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondents for non-compliance of the order of this Court passed in W.P.No.34334 of 2018 dated 27.02.2019.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sugendran For Respondents : Mr.V.Govardhanan
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition is maintainable if the directed order has been complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Mathalakshmi
- respondent
Mr.K.Nandhakumar
- respondent
Mr.R.Sudhan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court