Traffic Dr.K.R.Ramaswamy v. State rep. by The Chair
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought writ directing respondents to act on a representation regarding unauthorized banner erection and negligence. Court closed the petition to be represented by the Government Advocate for necessary action.
What did the court decide?
process closed to be represented by Government Advocate
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
W.P.No.27663 of 2017
Traffic DR.K.R.Ramaswamy Social Activist/Senior Citizen, S/o.Rangaswamy, No.123, Praksam Salai, Chennai 600 001. ...Petitioner .Vs.
State Represented by,
- The Chair person Digital Banner Committee, Rippon Buildings, Chennai-3.
2.The Home Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Tamil Nadu Secretariat, Chennai 600 009.
3.The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai City, Egmore, Vepery, Chennai 600 007.
4.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Triplicane Range, Chennai City, Chennai-2.
5.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, T.Nagar Range, Chennai-17. ..Respondents
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
DR. KR. Ramaswamy
- respondent
State Represented by The Chair person Digital Banner Committee, The Home Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai City,
Coram
N. Anand Venkatesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court