4.This Court is of the considered opinion that the territorial jurisdiction raised between the State of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry cannot be adjudicated at the behest of the petitioner Association who all are no way connected with such administrative decision taken at the Government level. No doubt if at all they find any irregularity in the matter of dealing with the issues or demarcating the areas based on the territorial jurisdiction, they are at liberty to approach the competent authorities including the Government of Puducherry, Government of Tamil Nadu and the third respondent, Madurantakam Cooperative Sugar Mills for submission of appropriate proposal, representation, etc. contrarily, the Association cannot file a writ petition for adjudication of such dispute between the States or raising a ground that the first respondent has no jurisdiction to interfere with the territorial jurisdiction of the State of Tamil Nadu or otherwise. These aspects require examination at the Government level and this Court in the present writ petition cannot decide such issues as the petitioner has no locus to question the order impugned in view of the fact that the order impugned is about declaration of Command Area under Ariyalur Sugar Factory and Puducherry Cooperative Sugar Mills Limited. No doubt the order impugned had been passed considering the representation from farmers. Thus, a decision is taken considering the representation of certain group of farmers and the present writ petitioner may also may raise certain objection on that, however, all such objections are to be raised before the Government for the purpose of re-consideration of this issue or for taking appropriate action at the highest level.
