Disposed

Seaport Logistics Pvt. Ltd., v. the Government of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC7 Sept 2021WP/26637/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ for a prohibition against entry tax demand on an imported vehicle. The court disposed of the petition after being informed that the petitioner had already paid the outstanding Entry Tax arrears during the pendency of the case.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands disposed of with no further adjudication needed as the tax was paid.

Seaport Logistics Pvt. Ltd., Vs the Government of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 07.09.2021

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

WP No.26637 of 2011

¶6

Seaport Logistics Pvt. Ltd., New No.85, Old No.42, Moore Street, Chennai - 1, rep. by its Director, M.S.Saifudeen. ..Petitioner

¶7

¶8

The Government of Tamilnadu,

¶9

rep. by its Secretary to Government, Commercial Taxes Department,

¶10

Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶11

The Assistant Commissioner of

¶12

Commercial Taxes,

¶13

Harbour – I, Chennai - 600 001.

¶14

The Regional Transport Officer,

¶15

Chennai (East), Chennai - 600 012. ..Respondents

¶16

PRAYER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents herein or their men, agents, subordinates from demanding or collecting entry tax in respect of the imported vehicle XCMG made ZL50G wheel loader with rock bucket with standard accessories bearing Engine No.1210E050321, Chassis No.11005180 to be registered with the 3rd respondent herein with new registration mark.

¶17

For Petitioner : Mr.A.S.Baalaji

¶18

For Respondents: Mr.V.Veluchamy

¶19

Government Advocate

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner made a submission that during the pendency of the writ petition the balance arrears of Entry Tax due i.e. a sum of Rs.4,33,719/was paid by the petitioner on 09.04.2013 itself [vide ICICI Bank Chq.No.37078 dated 30.03.2013].

¶23

2. In view of the fact that the petitioner has paid the Entry Tax as demanded, no further adjudication needs to be undertaken. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No Costs.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Assistant Registrar(CS-II)

¶26

//True Copy//

¶27

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶28

ars

¶29

¶30

The Secretary, Government of Tamilnadu, Commercial Taxes Department, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶31

The Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Harbour - I, Chennai - 600 001.

¶32

The Regional Transport Officer, Chennai (East), Chennai - 600 012.

¶33

+1cc to the Special Government Pleader (Taxes), High Court, Madras - 104 S.R.No.45983

WP No.26637 of 2011

PPA(CO)

RGA(12/10/2021)

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Seaport Logistics Pvt. Ltd., v. the Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Seaport Logistics Pvt. Ltd., v. the Government of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Selva Ganapathi Vs the State of Tamilnadu

M/S.Grandhe Construction Pvt. Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

M/S. Star Audio, Vs Commercial Tax Officer

P.Ranganathan Vs the Special Commissioner

M/s.Cognizant Technology Vs The Assistant Commissioner

Ge India Industrial Pvt.Ltd., Vs Union of India