The High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution for nonprosecution as the petitioner did not appear in person without representation on the date of hearing.
Petition dismissed for nonprosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.09.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.NO.11708 OF 2006 AND W.M.P.NOS.13301 & 9561 OF 2006
1.P.Ranganathan
2.Packiamuthu
...Petitioners
Vs
PRAYER:
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari after calling for the entire records concerned in proceedings No.G2/11251/2004, dated 22.01.2006 on the file of the first respondent, quash the same as illegal and unconstitutional.
For Petitioners : No appearance
For Respondents : Mr.V.Nanmaran
Government Advocate
The Matter was listed for hearing on 03.09.2021, there was no representation on behalf of the writ petitioner. Once again, the case is listed for hearing today (i.e. 07.09.2021) under the caption “for dismissal”. But, today also none represented on behalf of the writ petitioner.
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Pns
To
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.45911
W.P.No.11708 of 2006 AND W.M.P.NOS.13301 & 9561 OF 2006
KSM(CO) CS/13/10/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Ranganathan
Packiamuthu
Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Urban Land Ceiling and Urban Land Tax
District Revenue Officer
Assistant Commissioner of Urban Land Tax
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
