K. Athiyan Chettiar (Huf) v. the Income Tax Settlement
Madras HCWP/2654/2005
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
No substantive issue was decided. The writ petition, filed against an impugned order by the Income Tax Settlement Commission, was closed with liberty to restore it under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme based on the petitioner's submission.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed with liberty to restore under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶2
DATED: 24.03.2021
¶3
CORAM
¶4
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
¶5
W.P.No.2654 of 2005
¶6
K.Athiyan Chettiar
¶7
... Petitioner
¶8
Vs
¶9
- The Income Tax Settlement Commission,
¶10
- Additional Bench,
¶11
- 488-489, Anna Salai,
¶12
- Chennai – 600 035.
¶13
- The Union of India represented by The Chairman, Central Board of Direct Taxes, North Block, New Delhi.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
K.Athiyan Chettiar
- respondent
The Income Tax Settlement Commission
- respondent
The Union of India
- respondent
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai-V
- respondent
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Kumbakonam
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court