Quashed

M/s.Grace Infrastructure Pvt. v. The Commercial Tax Officer

Madras HC24 Mar 2021WP/8505/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition challenging a Commercial Tax Officer's order as violative of natural justice due to lack of consideration of a prior order. The court quashed the order and remanded the case for a fresh speaking order.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order quashed; case remitted to 1st Respondent to pass speaking order within three months; directions to file additional representation.

M/s.Grace Infrastructure Pvt. Vs The… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 24.03.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN W.P. No. 8505 of 2017 and W.M.P. No. 9293 of 2017

¶2

M/s.Grace Infrastructure Private Limited, Represented by its Director, RS.No.31/4, Tindivanam Road, Tiruchitrambalam, Vanur, Tindivinam District – 605 111. ... Petitioner

¶3

¶4

The Commercial Tax Officer (Main) Tindivanam, Commercial Tax Department, 23-B, Rajaji Road, Tindivinam.

¶5

The Commercial Tax Officer,

¶6

Nagercoil (Rural) Assessment Circle, Commercial Tax Department,

¶7

No.131, Mead Street,

¶8

Nagercoil – 629 001. ... Respondents

¶9

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the First Respondent in the impugned Order in TIN/33456124230/2011-12 dated 27.02.2017, quash the same as it is passed without considering the order passed by the Second Respondent on the very same issue and also in violation of the Principles of natural justice.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.V.S.Manoj For Respondents : Mr.R.Swarnavel Government Advocate

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Though this case was argued on merits, I am of the view that this case can be disposed on a short point on the ground that the impugned order has been passed without following the Principles of Natural Justice.

¶13

It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was originally within the jurisdiction of the 2^nd respondent/Commercial Tax Officer, Nagercoil and that the 2^nd respondent/Commercial Tax Officer, Nagercoil has also passed order on 09.01.2017, against which, an appeal of the petitioner

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

is pending before the Appellate Deputy Commissioner.

¶16

It is submitted that the impugned Show Cause Notice was issued by the 1^st respondent/Commercial Tax Officer, Tindivanam after the petitioner came under the purview of the 1^st respondent/Commercial Tax Officer, Tindivanam who issued Prerevision notice on 12.03.2014, which the petitioner also replied by a reply dated 26.03.2014. The 1^st respondent/Commercial Tax Officer, Tindivanam has however passed the impugned order dated 27.02.2017 and has called upon the petitioner for a personal hearing.

¶17

As the impugned order has been passed in violation of Principles of Natural Justice, I am inclined to quash the impugned order and remit the case back to the 1^st respondent, to pass speaking order after considering the submissions of the petitioner in their reply dated 26.03.2014 in the background of the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order dated 09.01.2017 purportedly passed by the 2^nd respondent/Commercial Tax Officer, Nagercoil.

¶18

In the result, the impugned order passed by the 1^st respondent/Commercial Tax Officer, Tindivanam is hereby quashed and the case is remitted back to the 1^st respondent/Commercial Tax Officer, Tindivanam, to pass speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, in accordance with law.

¶19

Since there are subsequent event which may also have bearing on the proceedings, the petitioner is directed to file an additional representation before the 1^st respondent/Commercial Tax Officer, Tindivanam within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶20

This Writ Petition stands disposed of with the above observations and directions. No costs. Consequently, connected Writ Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar (CS VII) /TRUE COPY/ Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶23

arb

¶24

¶25

The Commercial Tax Officer (Main) Tindivanam, Commercial Tax Department, 23-B, Rajaji Road, Tindivinam.

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶27

The Commercial Tax Officer, Nagercoil (Rural) Assessment Circle, Commercial Tax Department, No.131, Mead Street, Nagercoil – 629 001.

¶28

+1CC TO M/S.SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SR.NO. 19598

¶29

W.P. No. 8505 of 2017 and W.M.P. No. 9293 of 2017

¶30

PMK(CO) KKN 28.04.2021

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s.Grace Infrastructure Pvt. v. The Commercial Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Grace Infrastructure Pvt. v. The Commercial Tax Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Vgp. Golden Beach Resert Vs the Special Commissioner of

P.T.Rajan Vs the Income Tax Settlement

M/S. Talent Dyeing, Athuvali Vs the Joint Commissioner (Ct)

M/s.Daimler India Commercial Vehicles Vs Deputy Commissioner

M/s. Daimler India Commercial Vs Deputy Commissioner of

M/S.Seshasayee Paper and Vs the Assistant Commissioner