Dismissed

Akram v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Madras HC7 Dec 2021WP/26488/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Madras dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking a writ of certiorari and mandamus to quash an order regarding egg price regulation and direct the formation of an expert committee, holding the relief infructuous due to efflux of time.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous due to efflux of time. No costs awarded.

Akram Vs The State of Tamil Nadu — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED 07.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

¶5

W.P.No.26488 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.30803 of 2018

Akram

...Petitioner

..Vs..

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Chief Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

¶10

2.The Principal Secretary to Government, Animal Husbandry, Dairy and Fisheries Department, Government of Tamil Nadu,

¶11

Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

¶12

3.The Principal Secretary to Government, Social Welfare and Noon-Meal Scheme Department, Government of Tamil Nadu,

¶13

Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

¶14

4.The Director,

¶15

Animal Husbandry Department, Block II, DMS Complex, Teynampet, Chennai - 6.

¶16

5.The Chairman,

¶17

National Egg Co-ordination Committee (NECC), 28/1, First floor, Sri Krishna Complex, Karuppannan Street, Paramathi Road, S.P.Puthoor, Namakkal - 637 001. ...Respondents

¶18

PRAYER : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order made in Letter No.14940/Poultry/2018 dated 26.09.2018 passed by the 2^nd respondent quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to constitute a permanent expert committee to fix reasonable procurement of egg price as well as selling price for eggs in the State of Tamil Nadu and regulate the same for time to time.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

For Petitioner : M/s.K.Balu

¶21

For R1 to R4 : Mr.M.Shahjahan Special Government Pleader For R5 : Mr.M.Guruprasad

¶22

O R D E R

¶23

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, seeking for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order made in Letter No.14940/Poultry/2018 dated 26.09.2018 passed by the 2 nd respondent, quash the same and consequently, to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to constitute a permanent expert committee to fix reasonable procurement of egg price as well as selling price for eggs in the State of Tamil Nadu and regulate the same for time to time.

¶24

When the matter is taken up for hearing today i.e., on 07.12.2021, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that by efflux of time, the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and there is nothing survives for adjudication.

¶25

In view of the above submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

Assistant Registrar (CS-IX)

¶28

//True Copy//

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

sp/jd

¶31

¶32

1.The Chief Secretary to Government, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9.

¶33

2.The Principal Secretary to Government, Animal Husbandry, Dairy and Fisheries Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9.

¶34

3.The Principal Secretary to Government, Social Welfare and Noon-Meal Scheme Department, Government of Tamil Nadu,

¶35

Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai - 9. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶36

4.The Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Block II, DMS Complex, Teynampet, Chennai - 6.

¶37

5.The Chairman, National Egg Co-ordination Committee (NECC), 28/1, First floor, Sri Krishna Complex, Karuppannan Street, Paramathi Road, S.P.Puthoor, Namakkal - 637 001.

¶38

W.P.No.26488 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.30803 of 2018

¶39

SSN (CO) PR (03/01/2022)

¶40

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Akram v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akram v. The State of Tamil Nadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Golden Polas Vs The Director General of

Dr.S.Santhosh Kumar, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

The Tamil Nadu Film Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Kotteeswaran, S/o.Sanjeevi Vs The District Collector

M/s.S.N.N.Textiles (P) Ltd., Vs The Chair Man and Managing

N.Karthikeyan, Vs Union of India