Writ petition challenging non-disposal of patta cancellation compliant was dismissed as abated, as the sole petitioner died and no legal heirs filed for substitution.
Writ petition dismissed as abated. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.12.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
W.P.No.26226 of 2021
B.N.Padmanabhan
...Petitioner
Vs
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to dispose of the compliant dated 24.06.2019 for cancellation of patta within a stipulated period.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.N.Murali Moghan
For Respondents : Mr.V.Jeevagiridharan Additional Government Pleader (for R-1 to R-3)
ORDER
This writ petition is filed to issue a Writ of Mandamus,directing the second respondent to dispose of the compliant dated 24.06.2019 for cancellation of patta within a stipulated period.
legal heirs have come forward with substitution petition. Therefore, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed as abated. No costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kv
To
W.P.No.26226 of 2021
SPD(CO) RGA(21/12/2021)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives the death of petitioner without substitution.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B.N.Padmanabhan
The District Collector, Krishnagiri District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri Revenue Division, Krishnagiri
The Tahsildar, Krishnagiri Taluk, Krishnagiri
K.Palanivel
S.G.Raja
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
