N.Ganapathy v. Union of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court disposed of writ petitions under Article 226 as infructuous, recording no opinion on the merits regarding the petitioner's service dispute.
What did the court decide?
No order as to costs; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATE : 09.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
W.P.NO.25527 OF 2008 & M.P.NO.1 OF 2008
Mr.N.Ganapathy ... Petitioner .Vs.
- Union of India, Rep. By its Secretary , Department of Secondary & Higher Education, Ministry of Human Resources Development, New Delhi.
- The Dakshina Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha, Rep. By its General Secretary, Thanikachalam Road, T.Nagar, Chennai – 600 017.
- The General Secretary, The Dakshina Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha, Thanikachalam Road, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017.
- The Dakshina Bharath Hindi Prachar Sabha (Andhra), Rep. By its General Secretary, Andhara Pradesh, ... Respondents
PRAYER:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the 2nd respondent order dated 23.09.2009 made in Kariyalaya/MF/2008-2009/189 and quash the same and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to retain petitioner's services as Manager (Examinations) in DBHPS (Madras) till the disposal of the Review Petition S.R.No.66570 of 2008 pending before this Hon'ble Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Thirumavalavan
- respondent
Union of India
- respondent
Dakshina Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha
- respondent
Dakshina Bharath Hindi Prachar Sabha (Andhra)
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court