Disposed

R.Kesavalu v. The District Revenue Officer

Madras HC12 Nov 2021WP/24400/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition, the Madras High Court restrained lower revenue officers from measuring the petitioner's property without conducting a detailed enquiry, hearing the petitioner, and until the disposal of a pending revision petition.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of by directing the Tahsildar to conduct a detailed enquiry with notice and hearing, and to refrain from measuring the property until the pendency of the revision.

R.Kesavalu Vs The District Revenue Officer — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 12.11.2021

¶3

CORAM :

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

¶5

W.P.NO.24400 OF 2021 AND W.M.P.NO.25710 OF 2021

¶6

R.Kesavalu ...Petitioner

¶7

Vs.

¶8

1.The District Revenue Officer O/o. District Collectorate of Tiruvallur

¶9

Master Plan Complex NH-205, Tiruvallur Pin-602 001.

¶10

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Near SBI & Post Office J.N.Road Tiruvallur-602 001.

¶11

3.The Tahsildar Taluk Office – Tiruvallur J.N.Road

¶12

Tiruvallur-602 001.

¶13

4.T.Vasudevan ...Respondents

¶14

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to forbearing the respondents 2 and 3 from interfering with petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the property comprised in Survey Nos.43/1 to an extent of 1 acre & 43/2 to an extent of 94 cents situated at Thozhuvur Village, Tiruvallur Taluk & District without any authority of law unless the petitioner's Revision Petition dated 24.09.2021 on the file of the 1^st respondent is disposed of in accordance with law.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Balaji For RR1-3 : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan Government Advocate

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

The Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondents 2 and 3 from interfering with the petitioner's possession and enjoyment of the property comprised in Survey Nos.43/1 to an extent of 1 acre & 43/2 to an extent of 94 cents situated at Thozhuvur Village, Tiruvallur Taluk & District without any authority of law unless the petitioner's Revision Petition dated 24.09.2021 on the file of the 1^st respondent is disposed of, in accordance with law.

¶19

Heard, Mr.K.Balaji, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3.

¶20

The petitioner owned the property comprised in Survey Nos.43/1 to an extent of 1 acre & 43/2 to an extent of 94 cents situated at Thozhuvur Village, Tiruvallur Taluk & District. While being so, the fourth respondent and his brothers, without any title over the property, applied for cancellation of patta before the third respondent. The third respondent conducted enquiry and rejected the request of the fourth respondent by an order dated 20.10.2018. The third respondent also allowed the patta to be existed in the name of the petitioner's father. Therefore, the petitioner was constrained to file a suit in O.S.No. 21 of 2018 on the file of the District Munsif, Tiruvallur, for bare injunction, restraining the fourth respondent and his family members from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property. In the said suit, there is an order of interim injunction dated 13.08.2018 in I.A.No.359 of 2018 against the fourth respondent and his family members.

¶21

Pending suit, as against the order passed by the third respondent, the fourth respondent filed an appeal before the second respondent herein. Without considering the above interim injunction and the continuous possession of the petitioner's family, the second respondent cancelled the patta stood in the name of the petitioner's father by an order dated 29.07.2021. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed revision before the first respondent on 24.09.2021 and it is pending. While pending revision, the fourth respondent filed an application before the third respondent on the strength of the order passed by the second respondent to measure the subject property comprised in Survey Nos.43/1 to an extent of 1 acre & 43/2 to an extent of 94 cents situated at Thozhuvur Village, Tiruvallur Taluk & District. The third respondent issued notice dated 11.10.2021 and on receipt of the same, the petitioner's family members had submitted their objections for measuring the subject property, since the revision is pending on the file of the first

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶23

respondent. They also issued legal notice dated 23.10.2021 through their counsel.

¶24

Considering the above, the third respondent is directed

¶25

to conduct detailed enquiry on the petition submitted by the fourth respondent to measure the subject property, after issuance of notice to the petitioner and other parties, if any and after giving them an opportunity of hearing and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that the third respondent is directed to bear in mind that the petitioner has already filed a revision before the first respondent as against the order passed by the second respondent and it is pending. The third respondent is directed not to measure the subject property as requested by the fourth respondent till the final out come of the revision.

¶26

With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs.

¶27

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII)

¶28

//True Copy//

¶29

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶30

Lpp

¶31

¶32

1.The District Revenue Officer O/o. District Collectorate of Tiruvallur Master Plan Complex NH-205, Tiruvallur Pin-602 001.

¶33

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer Near SBI & Post Office J.N.Road Tiruvallur-602 001.

¶34

3.The Tahsildar Taluk Office – Tiruvallur J.N.Road Tiruvallur-602 001.

¶35

+1cc to M/s.K.Balaji, Advocate, S.R.No.58306

¶36

W.P. No. 24400 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.25710 of 2021

¶37

AD(CO) RVM(26/11/2021)

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

R.Kesavalu v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Kesavalu v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Peer Mohammed Vs the District Collector

R.Settu Vs The District Collector

Ponnappa Nadar Vs The Revenue Divisional officer

M.Rangan S/O.Muthan Vs The Additional Chief Secretary Cum

R.Manivannan Vs The District Collector

Subramaniyan Vs The Tahsildar