This order closes the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner could not be served due to the absence of a forwarding address, despite liberty granted to revive the petition.
Writ petition closed as infructuous; liberty to revive granted for 12 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.10.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH
W.P.NO.23333 OF 2009 AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2009
S.Ganesan ... Petitioner
.Vs.
... Respondents
PRAYER:-
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent in his Proceedings No.8722/K2/2004 dated 11.08.2005 and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner in the post of Junior Assistant from the date of his initial appointment, i.e., 29.06.2003 as per G.O.Ms.No.2024, Revenue Department, dated 15.05.1974 and Government Letter No.3096/Ma.Va.1(2)/89 dated 11.08.1989, Public (Refugee Rehabilitation) Department with all consequential and attendant benefits including further promotion to the post of SubRegistrar.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sankaran
For Respondents : Mr.S.John J.Raja Singh
Government Advocate
O R D E R
Learned counsel for the petitioner on earlier occasions reported no instructions. Thus, in the interest of justice, I have directed that notice issued to the petitioner by the registry and proof be placed on file. Notice has been issued, but Tappal has been returned as 'unserved' stating that the addressee has been moved without any forwarding address. In such circumstances, I see nothing to be gained by keeping this writ petition pending any further. This writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
vs
To
W.P.NO.23333 OF 2009 AND M.P.NO.1 OF 2009
JP-II(CO) PBS/30/11/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. Ganesan
The Inspector of Registration, O/o. The Inspector of Registration, Chennai
The District Registrar, Registration Department, Coimbatore District
Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
