D.Krishnakumar, v. The Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed for certiorari and mandamus was dismissed on account of non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 08.12.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
W.P.No.22277 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.26125 of 2018
D.Krishnakumar
...Petitioner
..Vs..
PRAYER : Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to letter dated 27.08.2018 in Na.Ka.No.264/Ka.2/A/2018 passed by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same and to direct the respondents to grant a permission to conduct the function as schedule on 30.08.2018 or any other alternative date subject to the feasibility.
For Petitioner : No appearance. For Respondents : Mrs.C.Meera Arumugam, Additional Government Pleader.
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing on the last occasion on 06.12.2021, none appeared for the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed on 08.12.2021 under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today (i.e. 08.12.2021), no one appeared for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not at all interested in prosecuting the case.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Pns
To
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.65845
W.P.No.22277 of 2018
SSI[co] NSK 10/01/2022
1 provisions across 1 enactments
D.Krishnakumar
Inspector of Police, Gramiya Police Station, Arakkonam, Vellore District
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Arakkonam, Vellore District
Superintendent of Police, Vellore District
Krishnan Ramasamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court