Disposed
N.Ulaganathan v. The Secretary to the
Madras HCWP/22143/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In this writ petition filed to restrain the Special Tahsildar from acquiring petitioner property under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, the petitioner alleged lack of due process. The court noted the respondent's counter that the land was not under acquisition. Consequently, the writ petition and the connected miscellaneous petition were closed with no order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition were closed. There is no order as to costs.