Dismissed

P.Arumugam v. The District Collector

Madras HC25 Jun 2021WP/21061/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras dismissed two writ petitions seeking a direction to grant patta name transfer. The court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petitions pending the confirmation of fresh orders passed by the Tahsildar, granting liberty to challenge those orders.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to withdraw writ petitions with liberty to challenge orders passed by the Tahsildar.

P.Arumugam Vs The District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 25.06.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

W.P.Nos. 21061 & 21062 of 2019

¶6

P.Arumugam

¶7

S/o. Ponnusamy Gounder ...Petitioner in both W.P.s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The District Collector, Collectorate, Tiruvannamalai Dt.

¶10

The Tahsildar, Tiruvannamalai Taluk, Tiruvannamalai Dt. ... Respondents in both W.P.s

¶11

PRAYER in W.P. No.21061 of 2019 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant patta name transfer to the petitioner by considering the petitioner's online application No.2019/0105/06/137724 dated 04.04.2019.

¶12

PRAYER in W.P. No.21062 of 2019 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant patta name transfer to the petitioner by considering the petitioner's online application No.2019/0105/06/137731 dated 04.04.2019.

¶13

For Petitioners in both W.P.s : Mr.S.Panneer Selvam For Respondents in both W.P.s : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan, Govt. Advocate

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

(The case has been heard through video conference)

¶16

These Writ Petitions have been filed seeking a direction directing the respondents to grant patta in the name of petitioner by considering the petitioner's applications dated 01.01.2019 respectively.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing,

¶19

Mr.S.Panneer Selvam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that, pending Writ Petitions, the 2^nd respondent Tahsildar had passed orders of granting patta in favour of petitioner on 22.11.2019 respectively. In the said circumstances, he may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petitions with liberty to challenge the orders passed by the 2^nd respondent before the appropriate forum.

¶20

In view of the submission made by the learned Counsel

¶21

appearing for the Petitioner, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the orders passed by the 2^nd respondent Tahsildar before the appropriate forum. No costs.

¶22

s/d-

¶23

Assistant Registrar(CCC)

¶24

True Copy

¶25

Sub-Assistant Registrar

¶26

rpp

¶27

¶28

The District Collector,

¶29

Collectorate,

¶30

Tiruvannamalai Dt.

¶31

The Tahsildar,

¶32

Tiruvannamalai Taluk, Tiruvannamalai Dt.

¶33

+1 CC to Mr.S.Panneer Selvam, Advocate sr 29658

¶34

+1 CC to The Government Pleader sr 29733.

¶35

W.P.Nos. 21061 & 21062 of 2019

¶36

RK(CO) SP(22/07/2021)

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Arumugam v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Arumugam v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishnaveni Vs The Managing Director

M/s.Kaavanoor Energy Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India

R.Karupusamy Vs The District Collector

S.Ramachandiran Vs Union of India

E.Subramanian Vs The District Collector

A.Kasi Vs The District Collector