Disposed

C.S.Senthil v. The Joint Commissioner

Madras HC6 Jan 2021WP/20453/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ of mandamus seeking direction to respondents to consider a pending representation and take action against the third respondent. The High Court directed the Assistant Commissioner to dispose of the matter after hearing all parties within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent No.2 to dispose the representation after hearing petitioner and R3 within six weeks.

C.S.Senthil Vs The Joint Commissioner — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 06.01.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH

¶5

W.P.No.20453 of 2020

¶6

C.S.Senthil ..Petitioner

¶7

.Vs.

¶8

The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Mayiladuthurai, Nagapattinam District.

¶9

The Assistant Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department, Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.

¶10

Arivali ..Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to Writ of mandamus directing respodnents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 09.06.2019 and take appropriate action against the 3rd respondent in accordance with law.

¶12

For Petitioners: Mr.Sounthar For Respondents: Mr.R.Venkatesh Government Advocate

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

The limited payer of the petitioner is for a Mandamus directing the disposal of his representation dated 09.06.2019.

¶15

Mr.R.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate who has accepted notice for the official respondents i.e. R1 & R2 confirms that the representation is yet pending before R2.

¶16

In light of the aforesaid, there is a direction to R2 to dispose the representation after hearing the petitioner as well as R3 and any other parties that may be deemed necessary and pass orders in accordance with law within a period of six (6) weeks from today.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

The writ petition is disposed with the above directions. No costs.

¶19

Sd/-
Asst.Registrar (CS VI)

¶20

/true copy/

¶21

Sub Asst. Registrar
To
1. The Joint Commissioner
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department,
Mayiladuthurai, Nagapattinam District.
2. The Assistant Commissioner
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department,
Kumbakonam, Thanjavur District.
+1cc to Mr.S.Sounthar, Advocate, Sr.No.546
W.P.No.20453 of 2020
rr ii (01/02/2021)

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.S.Senthil v. The Joint Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.S.Senthil v. The Joint Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Foster Wheeler (G.B.) Ltd., Vs Income Tax Settlement Commission

Ge Oil and Gas India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Mahasakthi Bio Enercon Pvt. Ltd., Vs Joint Director General

M/s.Rathinam Bar ( Lic. No. 85 / FL.2) Vs The Secretary to Government

M/s. Shri Kamakoti Agencies, Vs The Joint Commissioner (St) (Fac)

S.Vetrivel Vs The commissioner