Disposed

M.Govindaraj v. The Union of India

Madras HC22 Sept 2021WP/20231/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of an office memorandum regarding pay fixation. The Court adjourned the petition to consider a fresh representation filed by the petitioner independently of the impugned order and directed its disposal within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directing the respondents to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 21.08.2020 within eight weeks independently of the impugned order.

M.Govindaraj Vs The Union of India — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 22.09.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶5

W.P.No.20231 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.21484 of 2021

¶6

(Through Video Conferencing)

¶7

M.Govindaraj ...Petitioner

¶8

¶9

The Union of India, Rep by its Secretary, Department of Personnel & Training, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Promotions, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001. 2. The Union of India, Rep by its Secretary, Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001.

¶10

The Director General, Border Security Force, Force Head Quarters, CGO Complex, New Delhi. ... Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to office Memorandum dated 08.09.2020 in F.No.35034/3/2015-Estt.(D) of the 1^st respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to refix the pay of the petitioner at minimum entry level pay of Rs.7,510+ Grade Pay Rs.2,400/- to the corresponding scale of Rs.3,200-85-4,900/(Pre-revised) as per 5^th Central Pay Commission) and replaced in the revised pay Scale of Rs.5,200-20,200/- with Grade Pay of Rs.2,400/- (as per 6^th Central Pay Commission) on granting 1^st financial upgradation under ACP scheme from 21.08.2006 which is applicable to the post Head Constable from the date on which the minimum entry level pay prescribed for under Section – II of Part A of First Schedule of Central Civil Service (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Deliban

¶13

For Respondents : Mr.C.Kulanthaivelu Senior Panel Counsel

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

ORDER

¶16

The learned counsel for the respondent submits that petitioner's representation dated 21.08.2020 will be considered independently.

¶17

2.Considering the above representation, this writ petition is disposed by directing the respondents to dispose the aforesaid representation dated 21.08.2020 of the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and independent of the views expressed in impugned order dated 08.09.2020. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy//

¶20

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶21

jas

¶22

¶23

The Secretary,

¶24

Union of India,

¶25

Department of Personnel & Training,

¶26

Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Promotions, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001.

¶27

The Secretary,

¶28

Union of India,

¶29

Department of Expenditure, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi – 110 001.

¶30

The Director General,

¶31

Border Security Force, Force Head Quarters, CGO Complex, New Delhi.

¶32

+1CC to Mr.C.Kulanthaivel, Advocate, Sr.No.48430 +1CC to Mr.J.Deliban, Advocate, Sr.No.48833

¶33

W.P.No.20231 of 2021 and W.M.P.No.21484 of 2021

¶34

PCH (CO) K.RK. (18.10.2021)

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M.Govindaraj v. The Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Govindaraj v. The Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Vengatesan Vs The Member Secretary

S.Babu Vs The Chief Medical Officer

S.Daniel Fernando Vs The Director General of Police

M.Asokan Vs Pandy

K.P.Tamilmaran Vs The Deputy Inspector General of Police

A.Chandrasekar, S/o.Ammasi Vs The Secretary to Government