M.Asokan v. Pandy
Case brief
What is this about?
of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT…
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont,P.No.629 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D A T E D : 22.09.2021
C O R A M
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.SARAVANAN
Contempt Petition No.629 of 2017 (Through Video Conferencing)
M.Asokan, No.23, Ward No.4, Lakshmana Iyer Street, Jayakandapuram Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District ... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Pandy Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation(Salem) Ltd., No.12,Ramakrishna Salai, Salem – 636 007. ... Respondent
Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act,
to punish the Respondent herein for committing Contempt of Court for disobeying the order of this Court dated 15.07.2016 made in W.P.No.24380 of 2016.
For Petitioner : No appearance
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Asokan
- respondent
Mr. Pandy
Coram
C. Saravanan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court