Disposed

P.Jeevitha v. The District Collector

Madras HC16 Sept 2021WP/19586/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court held that the writ petition is not maintainable under Article 226 because an alternate remedy exists under Section 153 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983. The petitioner was given liberty to exhaust this remedy before the Registrar.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to exhaust the alternate remedy under Section 153 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 before the Respondent-2 by filing an application within 30 days.

P.Jeevitha Vs The District Collector — Cooperative Societies | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 16.09.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶5

W.P.No.19586 of 2021

¶6

(Through Video Conferencing)

P.Jeevitha

... Petitioner

1.The District Collector, Thiruvanamalai District,

¶11

Thiruvanamalai.

¶12

2.The Registrar,

¶13

T.N.Cooperative Society, Thiruvannamalai District,

¶14

Thiruvannamalai.

¶15

3.The Sub Registrar,

¶16

T.N.Cooperative Society, Cheyyar circle, Cheyyar – 604 407. Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.

¶17

4.The Secretary, V.L.Special,

¶18

148, Mullandiran Primary Agricultural

¶19

Cooperative Credit Ltd,

¶20

Mullandiran Village & Post,

¶21

Arni Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District,

¶22

Thiruvannamalai. ... Respondents

¶23

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider and pass orders based on the representation dated 05.07.2021 to the respondents and consequently directing the 4^th respondent to reinstate the petitioner for the post of computer operator with an early date at Mullandiram Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, Thiruvannamalai District.

¶24

For Petitioner : M/s.R.T.Sundari For Respondents : Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal Government Advocate

¶25

ORDER

¶26

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ learned Government Advocate for the respondents.

¶27

2.It is noticed that the petitioner has an alternate remedy under Section 153 of the Tamilnadu Cooperative Society Act, 1983. As a matter of fact, the Full bench of this Court in the case of K.Marappan Vs. The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies and another has also held that no writ petition is maintainable.

¶28

3.Considering the same, this writ petition is disposed by giving liberty to the petitioner to exhaust the alternate remedy before the 2^nd respondent Registrar in terms of 153 of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 by filing appropriate application/petition within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. If such an application/petition is filed within the aforesaid time, the 2^nd respondent may consider the case of the petitioner on merits and dispose the same in accordance with law. No costs.

¶29

Sd/-

¶30

Assistant Registrar (CS-VII)

¶31

//True Copy//

¶32

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶33

jas

¶34

¶35

1.The District Collector, Thiruvanamalai District, Thiruvanamalai.

¶36

2.The Registrar, T.N.Cooperative Society, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.

¶37

3.The Sub Registrar, T.N.Cooperative Society, Cheyyar circle, Cheyyar – 604 407. Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.

¶38

4.The Secretary, V.L.Special, 148, Mullandiran Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Ltd, Mullandiran Village & Post, Arni Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai.

¶39

+1cc to Mr.R.T.Sundari Advocate, S.R.No.47165 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.47508

¶40

W.P.No.19586 of 2021

¶41

BS(CO) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ GN(02/11/2021)

P.Jeevitha v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Jeevitha v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Baskar Vs The Government of TamilNadu

N.R.Manoharan Vs The Managing Director

S.Gopal Vs The Chairman Cum Managing Director

P.Dennison Vs The Director of Collegiate Education

M.Murugan, Vs The Director, (Tasmac)

M.K.Kanakaraj Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu