Disposed

Mr.M.Sridhar, v. The Collector

Madras HC1 Feb 2021WP/18707/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226. The Court directed the petitioner to submit an afresh representation for assignment of free house-site patta, relying on the Revenue Inspector's recommendation, to which the authorities must respond within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the petitioner to make a fresh representation for assignment of free house-site patta, relying on the Revenue Inspector's recommendation, to be disposed of on merits within twelve weeks.

Mr.M.Sridhar, Vs The Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 01.02.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

¶5

W.P. NO. 18707 OF 2018

M.Sridhar

...Petitioner

1.The Collector, Thiruvallur District.

2.Tahsildar,

Madhavaram.

...Respondents

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st Respondent to consider petitioner representation dated 17.07.2017 and dispose the same on merits within the time as prescribed by this Court.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mrs.Malini George For Respondents : Ms.A.Madhumathi Special Government Pleader.

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

The Writ Petition is filed to direct the first respondent to consider the representation dated 17.07.2017 made by the petitioner and to dispose the same on merits, within the time as prescribed by this Court.

¶17

The learned counsel, who is appearing for the petitioner in this case is unable to understand many things. Apart from embarrassing the Court by her false and misleading statements on facts, she is unable to understand basic questions that were put to her. She expected this Court to give a direction to the District Collector implementing the recommendation issued by the Revenue Inspector.

¶18

Despite this Court making efforts to convince the learned counsel for the petitioner to give alternative prayer, she is adamant that the present prayer should be considered by this Court. However, this Court is unable to grant the prayer in the manner in which it was sought for.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

The petitioner is permitted to make a representation afresh seeking assignment of free house~site patta and may rely upon the recommendation of the Revenue Inspector to the Tahsildar so that the District Collector will pass appropriate orders. On such representation being made to the District Collector or to the concerned Tahsildar, the District Collector or the Tahsildar may consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of such representation from the petitioner.

¶21

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. No Costs.

¶22

Sd/Asst.Registrar (CS IV )

/true copy/

Sub Asst. Registrar

1.The Collector, Thiruvallur District.

¶28

2.Tahsildar, Madhavaram.

¶29

+3ccs to M/s.Malinin George, Advocate, Sr.No.5170 +1cc to Government Pleader, Sr.No.5191

¶30

W.P. No. 18707 of 2018

¶31

VG II (CO) KKV/17/03/2021

¶32

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Mr.M.Sridhar, v. The Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.M.Sridhar, v. The Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Porkalai Vs The Additional Commissioner

S.ponni Vs The District Collector

Lakshmi Electrical Control Vs the Competent Authority and

S.Syed Noushath Vs Tamil Nadu Wakf Board

N.Jayabharathi Vs the District Collector

R.Sri Ramulu, Vs The District Revenue Officer