Writ petition filed by N.Jayabharathi for land acquisition compensation and enhancement. Petition dismissed as infructuous after parties submitted it was no longer maintainable.
No relief granted. Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 01.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
W.P.No.17857 of 2011
N.Jayabharathi D/o.K.S.Narasimhalu ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The District Collector,
Appellate Authority,
Land Acquisition,
Kancheepuram District,
Kancheepuram.
2.The Competent Authority and
The Special District Revenue Officer(L.A)
National Highways,
Kancheepuram.
3.The General Manager
(Technical) and Project Director,
Project Implementation Unit,
Eighth Floor, Annexe Building,
SPIC House, 88 Mount Road,
Guindy, Chennai-600 032.
Prayer: Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to consider acquisition of the remaining 260 sq.mts (7cents) of petitioner's land comprised in T.S.No.1/32, Block No.9, Irumpuliyur Village, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District and award suitable compensation within a stipulated time and further direct the first respondent to enhance the compensation of Rs.10,93,356/- paid for the lands having extent of 264 Sq.mts (7 cents) comprised in T.S.No.1/32, Block No.9, Irumpuliyur Village, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District already acquired by the second respondent vide proceedings in R.C.No.534/2006/NH 45 dated 22.11.2007 within a stipulated time.
(Prayer amended as per order dated 05.09.2011 by VBDJ in M.P.No.2 of 2011 in W.P.No.17857 of 2011)
For Petitioner : Mr.T.P.Prabakaran
For Respondents: Mr.M.Elumalai Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents state that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar tta Copy to 1.The District Collector, Appellate Authority, Land Acquisition, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram. 2.The Competent Authority and The Special District Revenue Officer(L.A) National Highways, Kancheepuram. 3.The General Manager (Technical) and Project Director, Project Implementation Unit, Eighth Floor, Annexe Building, SPIC House, 88 Mount Road, Guindy, Chennai-600 032. + 1 CC.to Government Pleader, Highcourt, Madras, Sr.No.5365 PVS(CO) SM/23/02/2021
N.Jayabharathi
The District Collector, Appellate Authority, Land Acquisition, Kancheepuram
The Competent Authority and The Special District Revenue Officer(L.A) National Highways, Kancheepuram
The General Manager (Technical) and Project Director, Project Implementation Unit, Guindy
S.S.Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
