The High Court of Madras dismissed two withdrawn writ petitions filed under Article 226 challenging a charge memo related to transport. The petitions were disposed of as withdrawn upon application by the petitioner.
dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petitions closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 28.09.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
W.P.Nos.18683 and 18688 of 2019 and W.M.P.Nos.18028 and 18031 of 2019 (Through Video Conferencing)
K.Krishnan ... Petitioner in W.P No.18683 of 2019 M.Bakialakshmi ... Petitioner in W.P No.18688 of 2019
Vs
Common Prayer :
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 2nd respondent in connection with the charge memo issued in Memo R No.68291/VB1/2007 dated 19.2.08 and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Ayngaraprabhu in both petitions For Respondents : Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal for R1 &R2 in both petitions Government Advocate
ORDER
The learned counsel for the Petitioner in both petitions seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also sent a requisition letter to the Registry, dated 24.09.2021, to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
uma
To
W.P.No.18683 and 18688 of 2019 and WMP.Nos.18028 & 18031 of 2019
MG(CO) CS/20/10/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Krishnan
M. Bakialakshmi
The Secretary to Government, Home (Transport) Department, Fort St. George, Chennai
The Special Commissioner & Commissioner of Transport, Chepauk, Chennai
C. Saravanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
