Disposed

K.Balasubramaniyan,M.a., v. The Principal Secretary to Government

Madras HC2 Sept 2021WP/18364/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ of mandamus directing respondents to fix his pay as S.I of Police, scale it up, and promote him to DSP with super-numerary post creation. Court disposed petition by directing respondents to consider petitioner's representation of 23.08.2017 and decide on merits within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directive to respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 23.08.2017 and dispose of same on merits within eight weeks.

K.Balasubramaniyan,M.a., Vs The Principal… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 02.09.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN

¶5

W.P.No.18364 of 2021

¶6

(Through Video Conferencing)

K.Balasubramaniyan

... Petitioner

1.The Principal Secretary to Government,

¶11

Home Department (Police II),

¶12

FSG, Chennai – 600 009.

¶13

2.The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 004.

¶14

3.The Additional D.G. Of Police, Economic offences Wing, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. ... Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to fix the petitioner's pay properly in the post of S.I of Police; consequently for an upward revision of pay in the post of Inspector, thereafter to promote the petitioner (deemed promotion) as the Deputy Superintendent of Police etc., over and above his known junior like Mr.Arumugaswamy, by suitably creating a super numery post as Dy Superintendent of Police etc., and help him to tie over his difficulties and problems and for getting revised pension with arrears and for other terminal benefits etc.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Mariappan

¶17

For Respondents: Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal

¶18

Government Advocate

¶19

ORDER

¶20

The learned Government Advocate submits that appropriate orders will be passed on the representation dated 23.08.2017 of the petitioner.

¶21

2.Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed by directing the respondents to consider the representation dated https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 23.08.2017 of the petitioner and dispose the same in

¶22

accordance with law and on merits within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar (CS-II)

¶25

//True Copy//

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

jas

¶28

¶29

1.The Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department (Police II), FSG, Chennai – 600 009.

¶30

2.The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 004.

¶31

3.The Additional D.G. Of Police, Economic offences Wing, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

¶32

+1cc to Mr.C.Mariappan, Advocate, S.R.No.44150

¶33

W.P.No.18364 of 2021

¶34

AK II(CO) GN(17/09/2021)

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Balasubramaniyan,M.a., v. The Principal Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Balasubramaniyan,M.a., v. The Principal Secretary to Government

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Barathidhashan Vs The District Collector

C.Sadasivam Vs The State of TamilNadu Rep by

R.Palanivel Vs The Director of Municipal Administration

J.Parthiban Vs The Managing Director

N.T.Senthil Kumar Vs The Director General of Police

P.Senthil Kumar Vs The Secretary to Government