Writ petition filed for quashing of order regarding HT tower erection on respondent lands. Dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time.
Writ petition dismissed as having become infructuous due to efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.11.2021
CORAM:
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice Krishnan Ramasamy
W.P.No.17826 of 2017
and W.M.P.No.19339 of 2017
P.Ramamorrthy [PETITIONER]
Vs
Tatabad,
Coimbatore -12.
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the Impugned Order passed by the 1st respondent vide Na.Ka.No: 6575/15/K4 dated 21.06.2017 and quash the same, and consequently forbear the respondents 2, 3 & 4 from taking steps to erect the HT Tower & Lines over the petitioner's Lands measuring Acres 21 acres, bearing S.F.No:400/1, 398/3B, 4, 403/1, 404/2, 404/4 of Vinnappalli Village, Sathyamangalam
Taluk, Erode District, till the strict compliance of the procedure established under Sections 10 and 16(1) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 read with Section 68(1) of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Karthik
for M/S.I.C.Vasudevan
For R1 : Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Govt. Advocate For R2 to R4 : Mr.Abul Kalam, Standing Counsel
When this Writ Petition is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and there is nothing survives in the Writ Petition for adjudication.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
jd/sp
To
Tatabad, Coimbatore -12.
W.P.No.17826 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.19339 of 2017
jpl[co] srg 29/11/2021
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Krishnan Ramasamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
