Writ petition seeking direction to bank to sanction educational loan was dismissed as infructuous since the petitioner had already completed the course duration, rendering the matter no longer survivable for adjudication. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.No.17674 of 2015
R.Pradeep
... Petitioner
Vs
... Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to issue application for educational loan to the petitioner and further direct to sanction a sum of Rs.2,64,000/- to petitioner's educational loan.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Thirugnanam
For Respondents : No appearance
The relief sought for in this writ petition is to direct the first respondent to issue application for educational loan to the petitioner and sanction a sum of Rs.2,64,000/- to him.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS II)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
av
To
The Branch Manager, State Bank of India,
W.P.No.17674 of 2015
EV(CO) CT(13/09/2021)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed for issuance of educational loan to the petitioner survives when the duration of the course has concluded.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Pradeep
The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Sundarampalli Branch
Selvam College of Technology
R. MAHADEVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
