Petitioners requested permission to withdraw writ petitions challenging an arbitrary transfer order. The High Court of Judicature at Madras granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petitions accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.08.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN
W.P.Nos.1406 & 1407 of 2009
V.Bakthavatchalam ... Petitioner in WP.No.1406 of 2009 G.S.Dinesh ... Petitioner in WP.No.1407 of 2009
Chennai – 600 083. ... Respondents in both WPs
Prayer in W.P.No.1406 of 2009: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records of the 2nd respondent comprised in Letter No.KKN/B8/1877/08 dated 20.01.2009 and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to convey he property comprised in KK 053 Plot No.R200, Kakalur Scheme, commercial plot admeasuring 8030sq.ft., in favour of the petitioner in the forms of bid finalized in the auction conducted on 11.11.2008 by the respondents.
Prayer in W.P.No.1407 of 2009: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for records of the 2nd respondent comprised in Letter No.KKN/B8/1989/08 dated 20.01.2009 and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to convey the property comprised in KK 040 Plot No.R35, Kakalur Scheme, commercial plot admeasuring 7654 sq.ft., in favour of the petitioner in the forms of bid finalized in the auction conducted on 11.11.2008 by the respondents.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramesh in both Wps
For Respondents : Mr.P.T.Ramkumar in both WPs
COMMON ORDER
When these matters were taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw these writ petitions.
3.Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, permission is granted to withdraw these cases and accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mrr/av
To
Tamil Nadu Housing Board,
+2CCs to Mr.R.Bharathkumar, Advocate, Sr.Nos.37609 & 37610 +1CC to Mr.S.Ramesh, Advocate, Sr.No.37568
W.P.Nos.1406 & 1407 of 2009
NMI (CO)
K.RK. (01.09.2021)
V.Bakthavatchalam
G.S.Dinesh
Tamil Nadu Housing Board
Executive Engineer & Administrative Officer, K.K. Nagar Division
R. Mahadevan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
