Disposed

P.Yesu Raj v. The District Revenue Officer

Madras HC16 Sept 2021WP/16903/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking release of his vehicle seized by Police for alleged illegal PDS rice transport. Court directed deposit of Rs. 25,000 and production of ownership documents for release, reserving merit for Adjudicating Authority within three months.

What did the court decide?

Directive to release vehicle upon deposit of Rs. 25,000 and production of ownership documents pending adjudication.

P.Yesu Raj Vs The District Revenue Officer — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 16.09.2021

¶3

Coram

¶4

The Honourable Mr.Justice R.MAHADEVAN

W.P.No.16903 of 2021

F.Yesu Raj

...Petitioner

Versus

1.The District Revenue Officer, O/o. The District Collector, Coimbatore District.

¶10

2.The Inspector of Police, CSCID, Pollachi, Coimbatore District.

¶11

...Respondents

¶12

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to release the petitioner's EICHER LORRY bearing registration number KL-07-BR-7765 which was seized by the second respondent on 22.07.2021 by consider the petitioner's representation dated 29.07.2021.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Vinoth For Respondents: Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu, Government Counsel

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to release his vehicle viz., EICHER LORRY bearing Registration No.KL-07-BR-7765 which was seized by the second respondent on 22.07.2021, by considering his representation dated 29.07.2021.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Counsel appearing for the respondents.

¶17

It is seen from the records that the subject vehicle was seized by the second respondent on 22.07.2021 on the allegation that the said vehicle was indulged in transporting PDS rice illegally. Therefore, this Court, at this stage, is not expressing any view on the contentions made by the

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

petitioner against the allegations made, as it is for the Adjudicating Authority to consider and decide. However, considering the fact that the vehicle was seized as early as on 22.07.2021 and the same is kept idle thereby exposing it to sun and rain, which undoubtedly would diminish its value, this Court is of the view that the following directions will protect the interest of both parties:

¶20

(a) The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) before the first respondent within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

(b) The petitioner shall appear in person and produce all the relevant documents proving the ownership of the vehicle for verification of the authority.

¶22

(c) On receipt of payment as stated supra and also on being satisfied with the ownership of the vehicle, the first respondent shall release the subject vehicle forthwith.

¶23

(d) The petitioner shall not use the said vehicle for any unlawful purpose and also shall not alienate the same during the pendency of the proceedings.

¶24

(e) It is open to the first respondent to initiate proceedings in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders on merits, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶25

(f) If no such order is passed within the time stipulated therein, the amount so paid by the petitioner shall be refunded to him.

¶26

(g) This order for release of the vehicle can be availed of by the petitioner, if the vehicle is not in the custody of Criminal Court. If the vehicle is in the custody of the Criminal Court, it is open to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate to get release of the vehicle by filing appropriate application and the same can be considered in accordance with law.

¶27

This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above

¶28

directions. No costs.

¶29

Sd/-

¶30

Assistant Registrar (CCC)

¶31

//True Copy//

¶32

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶33

mrr

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

¶36

1.The District Revenue Officer, O/o. The District Collector, Coimbatore District.

¶37

2.The Inspector of Police, CSCID, Pollachi, Coimbatore District.

¶38

+1cc to Mr.M.Vinoth, Advocate, S.R.No.47267

¶39

W.P.No.16903 of 2021

¶40

CP(CO) GN(11/10/2021)

¶41

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Yesu Raj v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Yesu Raj v. The District Revenue Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sundaram Oyyanakonar Vs The Regional Passport Officer

M/S. Vamptex Traders Vs M/S. Industrial Development

The Indian Medical practitioners Vs The Secretary

M/s.Sb Movers and Lifters Pvt. Ltd. Vs Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

R.Geetha Vs The District Disabled Rehabilitation officer

C.Sithan, Vs The District Collector