P.Venkatesan, v. Tamilnadu State Transport
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed for quashing a transfer order returned dismissed as withdrawn by the sole petitioner after filing a withdrawal letter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 12.08.2021
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR
W.P.No.14792 of 2011 and M.P.No.2 of 2011
P.Venkatesan S/o.R.Pandurangam 18B Munusamipillai Street Vellore-1.
... Petitioner
-Vs.-
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records in respect of the impugned order of transfer issued by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings Memo No.004/746/E1/TNSTC (VPM) Vellore 2011 dated 13.06.2011 and quash the same subsequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to repost in the same place.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Srinivasan For Respondents : Mr.C.Selvaraj Government Advocate for R1 R2-NA
O R D E R
Captioned matter is listed under the cause list caption 'FOR WITHDRAWAL' at the instance of counsel for sole writ petitioner, who has given a letter dated 09.08.2021 to the Registry enclosing a letter from writ petitioner which read as follows:
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CO)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mk
To
1.Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director Post Box No.56, 3/137 Salamedu, Villupuram - 605 602.
2.The General Manager Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd, Villupuram Region Vellore-9.
+1CC to Government Pleader, Sr.No.40410
W.P.No.14792 of 2011
PL (CO) K.RK. (01.09.2021)
P. Venkatesan
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd.
M. Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court