M.Govindan, v. the Principal Chief
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petitions filed against forest officials were dismissed as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioners who sought withdrawal before the registry.
Writ petitions filed against forest officials were dismissed as withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioners who sought withdrawal before the registry.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.06.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM
W.P. Nos. 14573 and 14574 of 2014 and M.P. Nos. 2 and 2 of 2014
W.P.No.14573 of 2014:-
M.Govindan .. Petitioner
Vs.
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the First Respondent in Proceedings No. B2/16762/2014-1 dated 29.05.2014, to quash the same and issue consequential direction to the respondents to allow the Petitioner to continue as Forest Range Officer with all consequential benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr. M.Ravi For Respondents : Dr. S.Suriya Government Advocate
W.P. No. 14574 of 2014 :-
C.Natarajan
.. Petitioner
Vs.
2. The Conservator of Forests
3. The Divisional Forest Officer
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the First Respondent in Proceedings No. B2/16762/2014-2 dated 29.05.2014, to quash the same and issue consequential direction to the respondents to allow the Petitioner to continue as Forest Range Officer with all consequential benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr. M.Ravi
For Respondents : Dr. S.Suriya
These Writ Petitions have been listed under the caption “for withdrawal” on the basis of the letter dated 08.06.2021 given by the Learned Counsel for the Petitioners before the Registry. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners sought to withdraw these Writ Petitions. Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.
abr/maya
To
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.27705 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.27705 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.27716
W.P. Nos. 14573 and 14574 of 2014
KV(CO) HS(14/07/2021)
M.Govindan
C.Natarajan
The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests Panagal Buildings Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015
The Conservator of Forests Erode Circle, Erode
The Divisional Forest Officer Bamboo Estate Division Gobichettipalayam Erode District
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court