Petitioner challenged tax interception under the Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles Act via writ under Article 226. Court disposed of the petition because the entry tax arrears were already paid.
No order as to costs. Writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23-08-2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
WP NO.14183 OF 2012
R.Vasanti Ram Narayan
.. Petitioner
vs.
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Transport Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Transport Commissioner, Transport Department, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
3.The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
4.The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Government of Puducherry, Puducherry. ..Respondents
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents, their men, agents or subordinates from intercepting the petitioner's Audi A6 3.0 TDI car bearing Registration No.PY-01-BM-8010 and levying, demanding and collecting tax in any manner whatsoever by invoking the power under the provision of Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990 (Act No.13 of 1990).
For Petitioner : Mr.Raghavan for Mr.Joseph Justin for M/s.Sampathkumar and Associates.
For Respondents-1to3 : Mr.V.Nanmaran,
Government Advocate.
For Respondent-4 : No Appearance
O R D E R
The learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 3, made a submission that the entry tax arrears due has already been paid by the petitioner.
2. In view of the submission of the learned Government Advocate for the respondents 1 to 3 that the petitioner has already paid the arrears of entry tax due, no further adjudication needs to be entertained in respect of the grounds raised in the present writ petition.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Svn
To
Transport Department, Fort St. George, Chennai-600 009.
2.The Transport Commissioner, Transport Department, Chepauk,
Chennai-600 005.
Chennai-600 005.
4.The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Government of Puducherry, Puducherry.
+1cc to Mr.Sampathkumar,Associates, Advocate, S.R.No.42151
WP 14183 of 2012
PCH(CO) PM/13/09/2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to issue a writ of mandamus directing respondents to stop intercepting the petitioner's car and levying tax under the Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles Act.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
R.Vasanti Ram Narayan
The State of Tamil Nadu
The Transport Commissioner
The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Commercial Taxes
The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Government of Puducherry
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
