Disposed

D.Rajamani v. The Assistant Executive Engineer

Madras HC22 Dec 2021WP/13977/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ under Article 226 seeking direction to the Electricity Board to pass orders on a representation for issuing an electricity connection to his land. The Court directed the 1st Respondent to consider the representation, afford an opportunity of hearing, and pass appropriate orders within four weeks. Petition disposed with no costs.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 1st Respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders within four weeks after hearing the parties.

D.Rajamani Vs The Assistant Executive Engineer — Specific Performance | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 22.12.2021

¶3

CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶4

Writ Petition No.13977 of 2020 D.Rajamani ... Petitioner

¶5

vs.

¶6

The Assistant Executive Engineer, Execution and Maintenance, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Veeraganur, Gangavalli Taluk, Salem District – 636 116.

¶7

The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Puliyankurichi, Salem District.

¶8

The Village Administrative Officer, Vellaiyur Village & Post, Gangavalli Taluk, Salem District – 636 116.

¶9

The Land Surveyor, O/o. Tahsildar, Gangavalli Taluk, Salem District.

¶10

(R3 and R4 deleted vide order dated 09.10.2020 in W.P.No.13977 of 2020)

¶11

D.Paneer Selvam ... Respondents

¶12

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1^st Respondent to pass orders on the representation dated 16.07.2020 by issuing electricity connection to the Petitioner's land in S.No.252/2B, South Kattukottai, Vellaiyur Village & Post, Gangavalli Taluk, Salem District – 636 116.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Velu For Respondents 1 & 2 : Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

Petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition seeking a direction to the 1^st Respondent to pass orders on his representation dated 16.07.2020 seeking electricity connection to his land in S.No.252/2B, South Kattukottai, Vellaiyur Village & Post, Gangavalli Taluk, Salem District – 636 116.

¶17

According to the Petitioner, he and his brother, the 5^th Respondent herein, partitioned the property in Survey No.252/2B, South Kattukottai, Vellaiyur Village & Post, Gangavalli Taluk, Salem District, as per the Partition Deed dated 04.12.2001 registered as Doc.No.1871/2001. The Petitioner constructed a house in the said Survey Number and used the previous electricity service connection. Thereafter, he applied for individual electricity service connection to the 2^nd Respondent. As there was no response, he made representations dated 31.08.2019 and 09.07.2020 to the 2^nd Respondent. But, no orders were passed on his representations. Thereafter, the Petitioner came to know that, the 5^th Respondent made an objection to the 2^nd Respondent not to provide electricity connection to him, as the 5^th Respondent had filed a Suit in O.S.No.181 of 2019 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Attur, praying for declaration and permanent injunction.

¶18

The case of the Petitioner is that, the Suit in O.S.No.181 of 2019 is only with regard to the 5^th Respondent's property and it does not pertain to his property. Thereafter, the Petitioner made a representation to the 1^st Respondent on 16.07.2020 requesting to issue new electricity service connection in his name. As no orders are passed on his representation, having no other alternative, the Petitioner is before this Court with the above Writ Petition.

¶19

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that, this Court may issue a direction to the 1^st Respondent herein to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 16.07.2020, within a stipulated time.

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the material documents available on record.

¶22

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without going into its merits, and also taking note of the fact that, there is no interim order restraining the Respondents/Electricity Board from granting new electricity service connection in the Petitioner's name, this Court directs the 1^st Respondent herein to consider the Petitioner's representation dated 16.07.2020 in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶23

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

SD/-

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

// TRUE COPY //

SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶28

(aeb) To:

¶29

The Assistant Executive Engineer, Execution and Maintenance, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Veeraganur, Gangavalli Taluk, Salem District – 636 116.

¶30

The Assistant Engineer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board,

¶31

Puliyankurichi, Salem District.

¶32

+1cc to Mr.K.Sathyabal, Advocate Sr.69493 +1cc to Mr.T.Velu, Advocate Sr.69434

¶33

W.P.No.13977 of 2020

¶34

svI[co] srg 10/01/2022

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.Rajamani v. The Assistant Executive Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Rajamani v. The Assistant Executive Engineer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Sri Karpagam Mills India (P) Ltd. Vs The Chairman

Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Vs The National Medical Commission

K.K.Varathan Vs The Chairman

Udayarpalayam Vattara Karumbu Urpathiaalargar Vivasaya Sangam Vs The Additional Chief Secretary / Commissioner of Sugars

M/s. Sonal Irons Industry Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Chairman

M.Palani Vs Indian Red Cross Society (Tamil Nadu Branch)