Allowed

M/s. Sonal Irons Industry Pvt. Ltd. v. The Chairman

Madras HC22 Dec 2021WP/27499/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the High Court of Madras directed the petitioner to pay additional surcharge arrears in ten equal monthly instalments instead of a lump sum, considering the petitioner's financial crisis amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, though it rejected the request to reduce the interest rate.

What did the court decide?

Directed payment of Rs.27,14,534/- in ten equal monthly instalments starting 05.01.2022.

M/s. Sonal Irons Industry Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Chairman — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 22.12.2021

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

W.P.No.27499 of 2021

¶6

M/s.Sonal Irons Industry (Pvt) Ltd., O.267/268, Kothajogur Village, Komearanapalli Panchayat, Denakanikottai Taluk, Hosur, rep. by its Authorized Signatory, V.Muniraj ... Petitioner

¶7

vs.

¶8

The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

¶9

The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Krishnagiri Electricity Distribution Circle, Krishnagiri.

¶10

... Respondents

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to pay the past period arrears of additional surcharge of Rs.27,14,534/- in ten equal monthly instalments along with their regular CC charges.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj For Respondents : Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh

¶13

Petitioner has come up with this Writ Petition seeking a direction to the Respondents to permit them to pay the past

¶14

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

period arrears of additional surcharge of Rs.27,14,534/- in ten equal monthly instalments along with their regular CC charges.

¶16

According to the Petitioner, they were issued a demand letter dated 25.11.2021, informing them to pay additional surcharge for the past period from April 2021 to September 2021 along with BPSC charges calculated at 1.5% p.m. (i.e. 18% per year) in one lumpsum within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of the impugned notice, failing which, their HT service connection will be disconnected. Due to COVID-19 pandemic, the Petitioner could not fulfil the demand of the Respondents. The grievance of the Petitioner is that, the impugned notice directing payment of charges as demanded by the Respondents in one lumpsum would cause serious prejudice to them, as they are already facing financial crisis. Hence, having no other alternative, the Petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition.

¶17

Learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that, a similar issue has already been dealt with by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.3075 to 3078 vide judgment dated 24.04.2008 and the same relief may be granted to the Petitioner herein and that, the Petitioner may be permitted to pay the past arrears of additional surcharge with BPSC at 1% per month (i.e. 12% per year) in ten equal instalments along with their regular CC charges.

¶18

Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondents objected to the submissions of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and stated that, the judgment dated 24.04.2008 relied on by the learned counsel for the Petitioner in W.A.Nos.3075 to 3078 will not be applicable to the facts of this case and hence, the relief sought for by the Petitioner cannot be granted and that, the Writ Petition is liable to be dismissed.

¶19

Though the Division Bench of this Court has ordered payment of BPSC charges in the said Writ Appeals, it has reduced the interest component. As the present set of facts are not identical to the case before the Division Bench, modification in interest would not arise. Hence, this Court, in the interest of justice, feels it appropriate that, the amount quantified by the Respondents may be directed to be paid in ten equal instalments.

¶20

Accordingly, this Court directs the Petitioner to pay a sum of Rs.27,14,534/- quantified by the Respondents in the demand notice dated 25.11.2021, in ten equal instalments, of which the first instalment shall be paid on 05.01.2022 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on the 5^th of every subsequent month.

¶21

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶22

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶23

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CO)

¶24

//True Copy//

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

(aeb)

¶27

To:

¶28

The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Limited, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 002.

¶29

The Superintending Engineer, TANGEDCO, Krishnagiri Electricity Distribution Circle, Krishnagiri.

¶30

COPY TO :-

¶31

M/s.Sonal Irons Industry (Pvt) Ltd.,

¶32

O.267/268, Kothajogur Village,

¶33

Komearanapalli Panchayat,

¶34

Denakanikottai Taluk, Hosur,

¶35

+1cc to Mr.R.S.Pandiyaraj, Advocate, S.R.No.68641 +1cc to Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh, Advocate, S.R.No.69651

¶36

W.P.No.27499 of 2021

¶37

SSN(CO) CT 29/12/2021

¶38

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/s. Sonal Irons Industry Pvt. Ltd. v. The Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s. Sonal Irons Industry Pvt. Ltd. v. The Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Sri Karpagam Mills India (P) Ltd. Vs The Chairman

Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College Vs The National Medical Commission

K.K.Varathan Vs The Chairman

Udayarpalayam Vattara Karumbu Urpathiaalargar Vivasaya Sangam Vs The Additional Chief Secretary / Commissioner of Sugars

M.Palani Vs Indian Red Cross Society (Tamil Nadu Branch)

H.Puvaneswari Vs the Commissioner of Police