Y.v.Subramanyam v. Inspector General of
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 due to the petitioner's non-appearance and non-prosecution at the date of hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 12.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
W.P.No.12956 of 2012 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2012 Y.V.Subramanyam ... Petitioner Vs. 1. Inspector General of Registration, Office of Inspector General of Registration, No.100, Santhome High Road, Chennai-600 028.
- The District Registrar,
Office of the District Registrar,
O/o.Taluk Office,
Chengalpattu,
Kancheepuram District.
- A.Karuppannan, ... Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the second respondent made in his order in Na.Ka.No.6021/A1/2011, dated 09.04.2012 and quash the same in so far as the findings and observations are made and consequently forbear the respondents 1 to 3 from proceeding or taking any steps with relation to the suit schedule property in Old Survey No.103/1 (part), New Survey No.103/50 & 69 (Part) at Kanathur Reddykuppam, Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu, Kancheepuram District to the extent of 75 cents till the Civil disputes reach finality in Courts.
For Petitioner : No appearance
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Y.V.Subramanyam
- respondent
Inspector General of Registration
- respondent
District Registrar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court