Petitioner challenged an order including names in land records. Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous after settling the matter outside the court. Review allowed.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to settlement; review permitted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.02.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
W.P. NO.10606 OF 2011 AND M.P. NO.2 OF 2011
Natarajan
...Petitioner
Versus
1.The District Collector, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram. 2.The Revenue Divisional Office, Madurantakkam Taluk, Madurantakkam, Kanchipuram District. 3.The Tahsildar, Cheyyur Taluk Office, Cheyyur, Kanchipuram District. 4.Saroja 5.Mallika 6.Ramalingm 7.Balaraman 8.Raman ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the second respondent in his impugned order dated 14.02.2011 in reference No. e/f/3756/2010/rp ehs: 14/2/2011 directing for the inclusion of names of the respondents 4 to 8 in patta No.367 and 983 of Peramankani Village Cheyyur Taluk, Cheyyur, Kancheepuram District and quash the same and direct the
third respondent to restore the said patta No.367 and 983 in its original form exist before 14.02.2011 by removing the names of the respondents 4 to 8 from the said 2 patta Nos.367 and 983.
For Respondents 1-3 : Mrs. A.Madhumathi Special Government Pleader 4-8 : Mr. V.G.Anbarasu
This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order of the second respondent dated 14.02.2011 and to direct the third respondent to restore the patta No.367 and 983 in its original form by removing the names of the respondents 4 to 8 from the said patta.
respondents 4 to 8, is not appropriate, it is open to the petitioner to seek review of this order. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
bkn
To
W.P. No.10606 of 2011
PMK(CO)
KKV/28/05/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Natarajan
The District Collector, Kanchipuram District
The Revenue Divisional Office, Madurantakkam Taluk
The Tahsildar, Cheyyur Taluk Office
Saroja
Mallika
S. S. Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
