Two writ petitions challenging the quashing of dental registrations were disposed of by the High Court of Madras as infructuous following a petitioner's submission that their grievances had already been redressed in the earlier proceedings.
Writ petitions disposed of as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 18.11.2021
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.11319 and 11321 of 2011
P.V.Unnikrishnan ...Petitioner in W.P.No.11319 of 2011
K.Mukundan ...Petitioner in W.P.No.11321 of 2011
Vs.
Union Territory of Puducherry
Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Govt.(Health) -Cum -Appellate Authority Chief Secretariat Puducherry-605 001. .. Respondent in both the writ petitions
Prayer for W.P.No. 11319 of 2011 : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus or any other writ, Order or Direction, calling for the entire records connected with the order of the Respondent in Dental Appeal No.9 of 2010 dated 03.08.2010 and Quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to register the Petitioner's name in the Register of Dentist as per section 33(1)(b) of the Dentists Act 1948.
Prayer for W.P.No. 11321 of 2011: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus or any other writ, Order or Direction, calling for the entire records connected with the order of the Respondent in Dental Appeal No.10 of 2010 dated 03.08.2010 and Quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to register the Petitioner's name in the Register of Dentist as per section 33(1)(b) of the Dentists Act 1948.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathia Chandran (in both WPs)
For Respondent : Mrs. V.Usha (in both WPs) (AGP Puducherry)
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner made a submission that the grievance of the petitioners has already been redressed in respect of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ W.P.Nos.11319 & 11321 of 2011.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-II)
//True copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
kan/shr
To
The Principal Secretary to Govt.(Health) -Cum -Appellate Authority Union Territory of Puducherry Chief Secretariat Puducherry-605 001.
+1cc to Government Pleader (Puducherry)SR.No.59822
W.P.No.11319 and 11321 of 2011
PMK(CO) GMY(03/12/2021)
P.V.Unnikrishnan
K.Mukundan
Union Territory of Puducherry
S.M. Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
