Writ petitions filed for quashing a notice and allowing shop operations were dismissed as infructuous because the Corporation had withdrawn the impugned cancellation order, leaving nothing for adjudication.
The writ petitions were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19.07.2021
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
W.P.Nos.11933 and 11937 of 2021
and WMP.Nos.12688, 12689, 12691 & 12692 of 2021
E.Naveen Kumar ... Petitioner in W.P.No.11933/2021
B.Mitravintha ... Petitioner in W.P.No.11937/2021
vs.
1.The Commissioner, Salem Corporation, Salem.
2.The Assistant Commissioner (in-charge), Suramangalam Ward Office, Salem Corporation, Salem. ... Respondents in both Wps.
Prayer in W.P.No.11933 of 2021: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned notice issued by the 1st respondent in K1/862/2018 dated 06.05.2021 (served on 08.05.2021 at 6 PM) and to quash the same and consequently allowing the petitioner to run the Shop No.19 in the allotted premises as per the lease granted vide Proceedings in K1/862/2018 dated 04.11.2020 with payment of compensation for the illegal demolition of superstructure of the shop, with all consequential and other attendant benefits.
Prayer in W.P.No.11937 of 2021: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned notice issued by the 1st respondent in K1/862/2018 dated 06.05.2021 (served on 07.05.2021 at 6 PM) and to quash the same and consequently allowing the petitioner to run the STD Booth and Snacks Shop in the allotted premises as per the lease granted, vide Proceedings in K1/862/2018 dated 04.11.2020 with payment of compensation for the illegal demolition of superstructure of the shop, with all consequential and other attendant benefits.
For Petitioner in both WPs. For Respondent
: Mr.M.Devaraj
: Mr.S.Sathish, Standing Counsel
COMMON ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for both the parties have informed to this Court that the impugned cancellation order passed by the first respondent Corporation has been withdrawn and therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
Jvm
To
1.The Commissioner, Salem Corporation, Salem.
2.The Assistant Commissioner (in-charge), Suramangalam Ward Office, Salem Corporation, Salem.
W.P.Nos.11933 and 11937 of 2021
sky[co] srg 10/08/2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
E. Naveen Kumar
B. Mitravintha
The Commissioner, Salem Corporation
The Assistant Commissioner (in-charge), Suramangalam Ward Office
D. Krishnakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
