A petitioner in-person filed a writ petition alleging record tampering in a rent control case where he failed to obtain favorable orders. The High Court reviewed a status report, found no evidence of manipulation, and dismissed the allegations as baseless, restraining future complaints on this matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 16.07.2021
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJIB BANERJEE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.P.No.10033 of 2021
J.Ganessin
.. Petitioner-in-Person
vs
The Registrar (Vigilance) High Court of Judicature at Madras Chennai - 600 104. .. Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to take appropriate action on petitioner's complaint dated 22.4.2018 and to protect in H.R.C.O.P.No.21 of 2010 in addition to H.R.C.E.P.No.5 of 2011 pending before the Rent Controller (Principal District Munsif) at Puducherry.
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Pursuant to the previous directions, a status report has been filed by the Registrar-General of this Court.
5. The petitioner as advocate should know better.
conduct of the matter will be entertained.
W.P.No.10033 of 2021 is disposed of without any order as to costs. Consequently, W.M.P.No.10664 of 2021 is closed.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (CS)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sasi
To
The Registrar (Vigilance) High Court of Judicature at Madras Chennai - 600 104.
+1cc to M/S.J.Ganessin, Advocate, S.R.No.33785 +1cc to M/S.J.Ganessin, Advocate, S.R.No.33785(23/07/2021)
W.P.No.10033 of 2021
SSN(CO) SU(22/07/2021)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the apprehension of record tampering by the petitioner in underlying tenancy proceedings is justified.
Whether further writ petitions regarding irregularities in the conduct of the tenancy matter are maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
J.Ganessin
The Registrar (Vigilance) High Court of Judicature at Madras
Sanjeev Banerjee
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
