Petitioner sought to be impleaded as a proposed third respondent in a related writ petition concerning property survey. The court held she was not a necessary party and dismissed the petition.
Petitioner not impleaded as she is not a necessary party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WMP(MD) No.3221 of 2021
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
( Special Original Jurisdiction )
Wednesday, the Ninth day of March Two Thousand and Twenty Two
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.PARTHIBAN
WMP(MD) No.3221 of 2021 IN WP(MD) No.2267 of 2021
SABAR NISHA.A
... PETITIONER/ PROPOSED 3rd RESPONDENT
Vs
1 NOORJAHAN BEGAM.M
2 THE TAHSILDAR MELUR TALUK OFFICE, MELUR TALUK, MADURAI.
3 THE HEAD SURVEYOR,
MELUR TALUK OFFICE, MELUR TALUK, MADURAI. ... 2nd & 3rd RESPONDENTS/ 1st & 2nd RESPONDENTS
Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioner herein as the proposed respondent No.3 in the above Writ Petition W.P.(MD).No.2267 of 2021.
Prayer in WP(MD). 2267/ 2021 :
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to direct the 2nd respondent to survey the petitioners property in Survey No.306/1B2PT, Block No.14, T.S.No.84 Muniyandi Kovil Street, Mugamathiyapuram, Sivagangai Road, Melur Town, Madurai District by considering her petition dated 24.08.2020 and for other such reliefs within the period stipulated by this Honourable Court.
ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.AJMAL ASSOCIATES, Advocate for the petitioner, the court made the following order:-
In view of the undertaking given by the learned Special https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Government Pleader, this Court is not inclined to allow this
1/2
WMP(MD) No.3221 of 2021
petition as the petitioner herein is not a necessary party in the writ petition. This petition is therefore dismissed.
sd/09/03/2022 / TRUE COPY / / /2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE TAHSILDAR MELUR TALUK OFFICE, MELUR TALUK, MADURAI. 2 THE HEAD SURVEYOR, MELUR TALUK OFFICE, MELUR TALUK, MADURAI. ORDER IN WMP(MD) No.3221 of 2021 IN WP(MD) No.2267 of 2021 Date :09/03/2022 MK/PN/SAR.III/11.03.2022/2P/3C
2/2
Sabar Nisha.A
Noorjahan Begam.M
The Tahsildar Melur Taluk Office, Melur Taluk, Madurai
The Head Surveyor, Melur Taluk Office, Melur Taluk, Madurai
V. Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
